Search for: "Joiner v. United States"
Results 21 - 40
of 83
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2014, 9:03 am
More to come.......5) United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 11:27 am
Works of the United States government, including works prepared by its officers and employees, do not qualify for copyright protection. 17 U.S.C. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 8:37 am
Woon v. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 6:51 am
Joiner, 522 U.S. 136 (1997); Kumho Tire Co. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 7:26 am
The Supreme Court shot down each of those arguments in Joiner v. [read post]
12 Nov 2012, 4:14 pm
United States, 346 F.2d 52, 54 (5th Cir.1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 976 (1966). 615 F. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 12:11 pm
United States – which was a product of the residual clause itself — has generated. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 2:57 pm
Back in the day, some Circuits of the United States Court of Appeal embraced an asymmetric standard of review of district court decisions concerning the admissibility of expert witness opinion evidence. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 7:20 am
Earlier this month, a panel of the Seventh Circuit of the United States Court of Appeal decided a relatively straight forward case by reversing the trial court’s exclusion of a forensic accountant’s damages calculation. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 7:00 am
United States, 293 Fed. 1013 (Ct. [read post]
9 Oct 2010, 4:20 pm
United States given that his wife May Ann liked to speak on the telephone. [read post]
21 Oct 2017, 9:00 am
See United States v. [read post]
8 May 2020, 3:47 am
United States, 54 App. [read post]
23 Nov 2013, 7:46 am
This case is out of the United States District Court, Southern District of Texas, McAllen Division. [read post]
28 Mar 2015, 9:24 am
The State of New Jersey, 174 NJ 412 (2002). [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 6:50 am
Hoyt, a Judge in the United States District Court, S. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 12:06 pm
United States, 293 F.2d 1013 (D.C. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 7:46 am
” Twerski & Sapir at 649; see Joiner v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 5:05 am
Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change v. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm
Not only was the statement wrong in 1993, when the Supreme Court decided the famous Daubert case, it was wrong 20 years later, in 2013, when the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Diclegis, a combination of doxylamine succinate and pyridoxine hydrochloride, the essential ingredients in Bendectin, for sale in the United States, for pregnant women experiencing nausea and vomiting.[16] The return of Bendectin to the market, although under… [read post]
