Search for: "Jones v Progressive"
Results 21 - 40
of 368
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Oct 2009, 7:41 am
Supreme Court's ruling in Ashcroft v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 1:41 am
If the purpose of patent law is to “to promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts,” then the laws enacted should recognize that [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 3:18 am
Waterman v Jones, 46 AD3d 63, 66). [read post]
10 Feb 2018, 1:14 pm
In Jones v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 5:24 am
Clinton, Arizona v. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 5:35 am
We’ll keep you updated as the case progresses. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 10:03 am
Only yesterday the IPKat finally sorted out the awesome decision in Imerman v Tchenguiz (here), and now he's catching up on Robert Andrew Jones v Ricoh UK Ltd [2010] EWHC 1743 (Ch), a Chancery Division for England and Wales decision of Mr Justice Roth midway through last month.Right: Ricoh's legal team -- or "relevant persons"? [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 5:31 am
Jones, 132 S.Ct.945 (2012). [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 8:59 am
The topic of my talk was “Law and Innovation: Is Intellectual Property a Path to Progress”. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 8:00 am
Doctors typically increase Pitocin as labor progresses, but not if the fetus shows signs of distress. [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 9:30 pm
Journalist Sasha Issenberg will explore the story behind U.S. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 8:49 am
In this post, Tim Sales, a partner in the Dispute Resolution team at CMS, and Hannah Jones, who works in the Tax team at CMS, comment on the decision handed down by the UK Supreme Court in the matter of R (on the application of Haworth) v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs [2021] UKSC 25. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 8:19 am
Aug. 23, 2019) (reversing district court’s judgment of dismissal under the Texas Citizen Participation Act and remanding for further proceedings under the federal rules)(Opinion by Edith Jones)Klocke v. [read post]
3 May 2017, 9:36 am
The re-enactment series is named for Frank Jones, a former president of the society. [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 5:00 am
In the case of Kelly v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 9:23 am
A key case dealing with libel on the Internet is headed to the Ontario Court of Appeal this week.Lawyer Peter Burnet of Ottawa’s Jones Horwitz Bowles Burnet will be making arguments on behalf of appellant John Baglow before the appeal court this week in Baglow v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 2:37 pm
Jones, 132 S. [read post]
9 Sep 2007, 6:49 pm
Progressive Direct Ins. [read post]
18 Oct 2022, 1:04 am
Mother Jones has a terrific article about the movement for SCOTUS expansion, featuring many quotes and much analysis from Sarah Lipton-Lubet. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 1:43 pm
Supreme Court in AT&T v. [read post]
