Search for: "Jones v. Producers Service Corp." Results 21 - 40 of 94
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2011, 1:29 am by INFORRM
The fifth defendant relied on Jameel v Dow Jones and Co Inc ([2005] QB 946) for this point, since the same test used there for whether there was a real and substantial tort applied to the attempt to set aside permission for service. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 6:48 pm
Catskill Mountain Mechanical Corp. and its alter ego, Plant Maintenance Services, Inc. (3-CA-26213; 352 NLRB No. 101) West Coxsackie, NY June 30, 2008. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 8:12 am by Eric Goldman
Your Service Cleaning” and its rival “At Your Service Housekeeping. [read post]
2 Dec 2017, 1:39 pm by Wolfgang Demino
            Defendant has learned that TSI has entered into a CONSENT ORDER with the CFPB concerning certain irregularities in affidavit production, and that the terms of the CONSENT ORDER require TSI to refrain from producing faulty affidavits and withdraw faulty affidavits already on file. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm by Schachtman
Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp., 788 F. 2d 741, 744–745 (11th Cir. 1986). [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 4:37 pm by INFORRM
The advert states that employees would be “actively participating in surveillance operations” and producing “evidential packages. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 4:48 pm by INFORRM
The LSE Media Policy Law Blog has covered the application of the EU Audiovisual Media Services Directive and the impact it is expected to have on media organisations practices when producing content. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:59 am by Tom Goldstein
Supreme Court retirements inevitably produce much more coverage of process than substance. [read post]
20 May 2010, 3:43 pm by Big Tent Democrat
Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp., 301 U.S. 1 . [read post]
13 May 2010, 1:40 pm by Fred Goldsmith
It is written, edited, and produced by Frederick B. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 11:14 am
However, the District Court did acknowledge that the Supreme Court in Dastar Corp. v Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp (2003) ( a subsection section (A) case) held that 'origin' refers to "the producer of the tangible goods that are offered for sale, and not the author of any idea, concept or communication embodied in those goods. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 4:07 pm by Schachtman
See, e.g., Lituanian Commerce Corp., Ltd. v. [read post]