Search for: "Joseph Smith v. US" Results 21 - 40 of 449
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Apr 2011, 5:27 am by Russ Bensing
  Smith’s denial of his involvement in the beating was buttressed by police serologist Joseph Serowick, who testified that his examination of Smith’s trousers showed no blood spots or splatters. [read post]
3 May 2011, 11:22 pm
Container, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 1:53 pm
Smith, Tenth Circuit: Appellant was convicted of two counts of robbery and two counts of using a gun during and in relation to those crimes of violence. [read post]
26 Apr 2007, 10:33 am
For publication opinions today (2): In Joseph Rich v. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 9:33 am by David Lat
Joseph Superior Court Tuesday, when Judge Jerome Frese set his trial for Jan. 3.Smith, 43, faces one count of domestic battery, a class D felony. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 3:57 pm by Wolfgang Demino
 SAMARA PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT, LLC AND JOSEPH ONWUTEAKA, Appellants,v.NEDA ZARGARI, Appellee.No. 13-17-00049-CV.Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi, Edinburg.Delivered and filed June 14, 2018.Joseph O. [read post]
14 Sep 2019, 11:25 am by Randall Hodgkinson
Zuschek[Affirmed; Beier; February 14, 2020]Improper use of prior misdemeanor for criminal history and to elevate battery to felonyState v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 8:43 am by John Elwood
  The odds are good that we’re about to get one more, in a capital case out of the Eleventh Circuit, Lawrence Joseph Jefferson v. [read post]
26 Jul 2014, 9:25 am by Randall Hodgkinson
Joseph Buser, No. 105,982 (Mitchell)Sentencing appeal (petition for review)Meryl Carver-AllmondLifetime postrelease is cruel and unusualImproper use of juvenile adjudication as conviction for KORAImproper collection fee not authorized by statuteSeptember 12--Friday--a.m. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 11:22 am by Schachtman
  One of the more glaring examples of bad scholarship in this area comes in a text edited by Professor Joseph Gastwirth: “The court in Landrigan v. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 4:23 am by Edith Roberts
The first was Murphy v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 10:04 am by Schachtman
Kan. 2002) (acknowledging that most courts require a showing of RR > 2, but questioning their reasoning), aff’d, 356 F. 3d 1326 (10th Cir. 2004) Smith v. [read post]