Search for: "Juan Doe X"
Results 21 - 40
of 56
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Mar 2020, 4:59 am
App’x 773, 776 (6th Cir. 2014) (quoting Stern v. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 6:55 am
Brand X Internet Services. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 1:00 pm
The court also said that Dignity Health does not have a right to violate California’s nondiscrimination law. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 12:33 pm
The justices sent Roman Catholic Archdiocese of San Juan v. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 11:30 am
Courts of Appeals for the 1st, 4th and 11th Circuits hold; does it instead create a jury question, as the U.S. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 7:40 am
Courts of Appeals for the 1st, 4th and 11th Circuits hold; does it instead create a jury question, as the U.S. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 9:07 am
Brand X Internet Services? [read post]
25 Sep 2018, 9:01 pm
If I say “X should be allowed to say Y,” some might conclude that (a) I agree with X about Y, (b) I am causing harm to people who object to the saying of Y, or (c) I am an accomplice in the larger project in which X is engaged and of which saying Y is just one part.My view is that people should strive to speak the truth and be willing to listen to others speak the truth, even when it is unpleasant or even painful to hear. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 9:30 am
Jones, and Juan C. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 2:04 pm
City of San Juan, 90 F.3d 910, 916 (5th Cir. 1996)).[51] 9 U.S.C § 2. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 11:02 am
(Corrupción en ascenso en América Latina y el Caribe)The political context in which corruption is understood and managed has seen a fundamental transformation from the first steps to redefine the political response to corruption by the U.S. and its Foreign Corrupt Practices Act in the 1970s, to the embrace of global normative political anti-corruption rules in the form of the OECD's Anti-Bribery Convention and the UN Corruption Convention. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 2:31 pm
Indeed, one might be moved to ask: who gets to pay the price for ideology (or better put how does will ideology cost us)? [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 11:51 am
Federal law simply does not provide for such a defense in a trial for illegal reentry, or in Judge Gorsuch’s words, it “does not afford a license to bootstrap separate criminal proceedings into the process guaranteed to aliens facing deportation. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 5:43 pm
Cohen of Vorys on the firm’s blog, Internet Defamation Removal Attorneys Back to the Future: SpaceShip 2 and the X-15 – St. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 1:53 am
I would not recommend long tossing on two consecutive daysMourners filled the pews at Saturday’s funeral for Jessica Hernandez at Holy Trinity Catholic Church in Westminster, in the suburbs north of Denver where she grew up Program runs September 2014 June 201585 x 82 Even if it was there, it needed careful detailing As a running back at Duke, he shattered the legendary Ace Parker rushing and scoring records and set the Atlantic Coast Conference single game scoring record of 26 points… [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 5:40 am
The phones also revealed a confirmed plane ticket from San Juan to New York for 9:35 the following morning, contradicting Molina's statement to CBP officers that he would be working in San Juan at 8:00 a.m.U.S. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2015, 2:13 pm
Since the court did not enter any factual findings, as it does when a parent consents to the jurisdiction of the court under Section 1051(a) of the Family Court Act in Article X proceedings, no adjudication on the merits took place (Mirelle F. v Renol F., 4 Misc 3d 1011(a) [Sup Ct Queens County 2004]) and there is nothing which could affect or bind the Petitioner in the future (Metz v People, 73 Misc 2d 219 [Sup Ct Nassau County 1973]; Lockwood v Lockwood, 23 Misc 3d 679 [Fam Ct… [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 11:38 am
Since the court did not enter any factual findings, as it does when a parent consents to the jurisdiction of the court under Section 1051(a) of the Family Court Act in Article X proceedings, no adjudication on the merits took place (Mirelle F. v Renol F., 4 Misc 3d 1011(a) [Sup Ct Queens County 2004]) and there is nothing which could affect or bind the Petitioner in the future (Metz v People, 73 Misc 2d 219 [Sup Ct Nassau County 1973]; Lockwood v Lockwood, 23 Misc 3d 679 [Fam Ct… [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 7:05 am
App’x 633, 636 (9th Cir. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 11:43 pm
Think about what this means: there are only 22 x 36 = 712 possible syllables! [read post]
