Search for: "Juned v. Holder, Jr." Results 21 - 40 of 90
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2019, 2:20 pm by Mark Graber
Trump also denied having any business in or connections to Russia, even though as late as June 2016 the Trump Organization had been pursuing a licensing deal for a skyscraper to be built in Russia called Trump Tower Moscow. . . . [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 2:40 pm
In the United States, that might mean the enterprise embedded within society; in Japan, it might suggest an enterprise embedded in itself and then society—that is, corporations are autonomous and independent entities capable of self-ownership.13 As a societal actor, the autonomy of the enterprise is privileged over the property rights of its equity holders. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 4:13 pm by Lyle Denniston
Two years after the Katz decision, in the case of Smith v. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 6:31 am by Wolfgang Demino
Godoy guaranteed the promissory note.GDG defaulted on the note, and Wells Fargo — Wachovia's successor by merger and holder of the note — foreclosed on the real property securing the note on November 1, 2011. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 6:31 am by Wolfgang Demino
Godoy guaranteed the promissory note.GDG defaulted on the note, and Wells Fargo — Wachovia's successor by merger and holder of the note — foreclosed on the real property securing the note on November 1, 2011. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 12:38 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
Mendoza, Appellees.No. 04-16-00435-CV.Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, San Antonio.Delivered and Filed June 14, 2017. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 1:26 pm
In the United States that might mean the enterprise embedded within society; in Japan, it might suggest an enterprise embedded in itself and then society—that is, of corporations as autonomous and independent entities capable of self-ownership.[11] As a societal actor, the autonomy of the enterprise is privileged over the property rights of its equity holders. [read post]
3 Jul 2016, 4:20 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Holder undermines and essentially guts the Act’s practical reach, while somehow leaving it constitutionality intact, with Part V looking at the Act’s future and limited practical application, serving as this Article’s conclusion. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 3:29 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Archer Jr. of the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am by Ben
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general… [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 8:59 am
I blogged about this case in June, but yesterday the federal district court handed down its ruling (City of Inglewood v. [read post]