Search for: "Justice v. Director of Revenue"
Results 21 - 40
of 500
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Nov 2023, 3:00 am
Democratic Plan to Subpoena Supreme Court Justices’ Allies Faces Pushback MSN – Ann Marimow (Washington Post) | Published: 11/8/2023 Democrats in Congress have tried unsuccessfully to press the Supreme Court to strengthen its ethics rules following revelations that some justices accepted and did not report free luxury travel, real estate deals, and gifts from wealthy benefactors. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 8:39 am
Any financial institution subject to Title V of the Gamm Leach Bliley Act. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 2:26 am
On 13 October 2023, Mr Justice Julian Knowles handed down judgement in Aaronson v Stones [2023] EWHC 2399 (KB). [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 11:10 am
Jones v. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 9:50 am
This can occur, for example, if the firm receives a profit, dividend, or revenue share even when it loses business to a rival. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 9:29 am
As Justice Antonin Scalia stressed in Verizon v. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 7:42 am
ACLU, Justice O’Connor claimed that content regulations could be analogized to “cyber-zoning” rules. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 11:46 am
LII Co-Directors Sara Frug and Craig Newton preparing to hand out treats during our 30th anniversary celebration at Cornell Law School. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 9:44 am
Alexis de Tocqueville, Of the Use Which Americans Make of Public Associations and Civic Life, Section 2, Chapter V in Democracy in America, Volume II (1840). [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 5:44 am
Every year after Labor Day, I take a step back to survey the most important current trends and developments in the world of Directors’ and Officers’ liability and insurance. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
-based firms (including subsidiaries) with at least $500 million in annual revenues would likely qualify as “doing business” in California.[17] (Insurance companies, which are covered by other separate legislation in California, are excluded.) [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 4:00 am
As directors of a board, Benchers also have fiduciary obligations that require them to act in the best interests of the LSO. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
As the Supreme Court observed in Forsyth County v. [read post]
4 Jun 2023, 7:40 pm
Hughes v. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 5:48 am
The only limitation is a general admonition, set forth in the Attorney General’s Guidelines for Domestic FBI Operations, that “[a]ll activities under these Guidelines must have a valid purpose consistent with these Guidelines, and must be carried out in conformity with the Constitution and all applicable statutes, executive orders, Department of Justice regulations and policies, and Attorney General guidelines. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 12:30 pm
Oklahoma prison employee raises concerns with prison director that the deputy director is abusing inmates; director doesn't want to hear about it. [read post]
1 Apr 2023, 1:34 am
Yesterday (Friday, March 31) the DOJ filed its reply brief in support of its motion for sanctions: United States of America, et al., v. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 2:13 am
Lifestyle Equities C.V. and another v Ahmed and another, heard 20th February 2023 Morgan and others v Ministry of Justice (Northern Ireland), heard 22nd February 2023 JTI POLSKA Sp. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 2:44 am
Lifestyle Equities C.V. and another v Ahmed and another, heard 20th February 2023 Morgan and others v Ministry of Justice (Northern Ireland), heard 22nd February 2023 JTI POLSKA Sp. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 11:35 am
Michael, The Guardians of the New Internal Revenue Code, 25 Fla. [read post]
