Search for: "KMART CORP"
Results 21 - 40
of 96
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jan 2017, 9:51 am
In Wackenhut Corp. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 4:11 pm
Penney Company, KMART Holding Corp and many others have faced legal action due to alleged ADA non-compliance. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 5:56 am
The Department of Justice announced settlements in the following False Claims Act lawsuits: KMART Corporation Pays $1.4 Million to Resolve False Claims Act Allegations in Connection with Drug Manufacturer Coupons and Gas Discounts KMART Corp. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 8:00 am
Although largely unresolved, there have been several whistleblower complaints filed against Education Management Corp. [read post]
12 Sep 2015, 4:19 pm
Fisons Corp. [read post]
7 Sep 2015, 7:58 pm
Sears Holdings Corp et al. made no determination of liability on the part of Kmart. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 6:22 pm
According to DOJ’s press release: KMART Corp. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 3:00 am
Employer relied on the Supreme Court’s decision in Kmart Corp. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 6:07 am
Fisons Corp. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 3:25 am
The lawsuit also lists Sears Holdings Corp., Kmart’s parent company, as a defendant. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 2:12 pm
United Corp. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 1:47 pm
Kmart Corp. will pay more than $102,000 to settle claims it denied employment to a Hyattsville job applicant who could not submit to a urine sample for the company’s pre-employment drug screening due to his diseased kidneys. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 7:54 am
Kmart Corp., Case No. 14-cv-02749 (N.D. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 7:27 am
Kmart Corp.; and Fardig v. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 1:18 pm
Kmart Corp., Case No. 14-cv-02749 (N.D. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 10:50 am
Kmart Corp. the petitioners tried to argue for the existence of splits, but the justices were not convinced — and for good reasons (as the briefs in opposition made clear). [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 7:55 am
But the court would not consider Kmart’s attempt to include specific communications and emails from the EEOC that occurred during the conciliation process; Title VII prohibits use of these documents as evidence without written consent, and it granted the EEOC’s motion to strike those communications (EEOC v Kmart Corp, October 15, 2014, Hazel, G). [read post]
28 Sep 2014, 2:25 pm
Kmart Corp., 233 F.3d 734, 748 (3d Cir. 2000) (questioning the methodology of an expert because his “novel synthesis” of two accepted methodologies allowed the expert to ”offer a subjective judgment … in the guise of a reliable expert opinion”). [read post]
14 Sep 2014, 9:45 am
Kmart Corp., 136 Ill.2d 132 (1990). [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 1:22 pm
Per the 2000 ruling by the Alabama Supreme Court in Kmart Corp. v. [read post]
