Search for: "King v. Richardson" Results 21 - 40 of 114
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Feb 2007, 12:14 am
Sherry Bender KINGS COUNTYLegal Profession Firm's Cross-Claim Against Another Firm Dismissed; Inextricably Linked With Plaintiffs' Dismissed Claim Richardson v. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 3:19 am by INFORRM
The award was made following a 2008 High Court jury finding that Martin McDonagh was libelled in an article describing him as a “Traveller drug king. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 6:53 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
The appellant, represented by Fish & Richardson, lost. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 2:44 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
In the Privy Council on Tuesday 24 June 2014 is the St Vincent and Grenadines appeal of Baldwin King & Hariette Richardson v Gershon Robertson relating to bona fide purchasers of land and adverse possession. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 5:13 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
The Privy Council will hand down judgment in Baldwin King and Hariette Richardson v Gherson Robertson on Monday 27 October in Court 3 at 11am and will then hear the case of Peerthum v The Independent Commission against Corruption and Anor regarding whether the Prevention of Corruption Act 2002, s 24(5)(b), interferes with the role of the Disciplined Forces Service Commission. [read post]
10 Oct 2021, 8:42 pm by Aaron Moss
The New York Times reported on the filing of House’s lawsuit against Mark Twain on January 27, 1890The “stolen ideas” lawsuit, captioned House v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 9:07 am
(China Law Blog) ‘Class’ justice in trademark rights: Lan Kwai Fong (IP Dragon)   Denmark Copenhagen Maritime and Commercial Court: Unilever’s ice cream KING CONE did not infringe Danish trademark KING COOL (Class 46) New Danish rules on valuation of IP (Innovationpartners)   Europe CFI: Lange Uhren watch shape appeal dismissed: Lange Uhren GmbH v OHIM (Class 46) CFI: no similarity between "MANGO… [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
Richardson[ix]to treat sex discrimination as a genuine suspect classification and in Milliken v. [read post]