Search for: "King v. Secretary of Health and Human Services"
Results 21 - 40
of 79
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Dec 2020, 8:40 am
In Muransky v. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 1:38 pm
Miller (Wikipedia) U.S. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 1:17 am
Accepting the “tainted” evidence generated by the unlicensed practice of medicine would contravene public policy.[12] Although the challenged physician had committed a criminal offense under Washington law, Judge Armstrong did not refer the matter to the King County prosecutor. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 9:05 pm
Its title is the Humane Society of the United States v. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 9:00 am
Considering that this is branded as a public health crisis, one would assume schools would be forthcoming with data about vaping incidents on campuses to help inform policymakers. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 9:00 am
Considering that this is branded as a public health crisis, one would assume schools would be forthcoming with data about vaping incidents on campuses to help inform policymakers. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 7:08 am
* * * *The Supreme Court explained, in the second of its ACA cases (King v. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm
In ALDF v. [read post]
Frenemies at Last?: How Legislative History Could Save Justice Kavanaugh’s Opinion in Azar v. Allina
13 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
Yet, in Azar v. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 10:04 am
(i) Those who can’t afford coverage; (ii) taxpayers below the poverty line; (iii) members of Indian tribes; (iv) individuals experiencing “short coverage gaps” in health insurance; and (v) persons who’ve received a “hardship” exemption from the Secretary of Health and Human Services. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 2:48 pm
Department of Health and Human Services, in 2015, Kavanaugh would have held that the ACA complied with the clause of the Constitution that requires all bills for raising revenue to originate in the House of Repre [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 8:00 am
Council of Civil Service Unions v Minister for the Civil Service [1984]: Reviewing the PrerogativeRichard Drabble6. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 2:00 am
R (A) (a Child) (by her litigation friend B) v Secretary of State for Health, heard 2 November 2016. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 9:47 am
It achieves this by examining the broader social, political, legal, health and welfare impacts of legal aid cuts and prescriptive service guidelines. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 9:47 am
It achieves this by examining the broader social, political, legal, health and welfare impacts of legal aid cuts and prescriptive service guidelines. [read post]
12 May 2016, 10:35 am
” King v. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 5:00 pm
Employer and union sponsored group health plans covered by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) and their insurers are not required to comply with a Vermont state law that requires health insurers and certain other parties to report payments relating to health care claims and other information relating to health care services to a state agency for compilation in an all-inclusive health care database, according to the United… [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 6:01 am
The Correctional Service of Canada (CSC) now accepts that long periods in segregation are not conducive to prisoner health or correctional goals—these facts are not in dispute. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 2:24 am
The Panopticon blog has a post about the decision in W, X, Y and Z v Secretary of State for Health, Secretary of State for the Home Department and British Medical Association [2015] EWCA Civ 1034 concerning the sharing of medical information. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 5:58 am
In King v. [read post]
