Search for: "Kingston v. Kingston" Results 21 - 40 of 343
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2009, 7:33 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Ferguson v British Gas Trading Ltd. [2009] EWCA Civ 46 (10 February 2009) Zipher Ltd v Markem Systems Ltd & Anor [2009] EWCA Civ 44 (10 February 2009) Matuszowicz v Kingston Upon Hull City Council [2009] EWCA Civ 22 (10 February 2009) Guy v Pannone Llp [2009] EWCA Civ 30 (10 February 2009) Ugiagbe v [...] [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 1:19 pm
Judgment Released: March 10, 2010  Link to Judgment The Court concurred with Wood v. 156 Kingston Residences Corp., 2010 ONSC 1250 (Master), that where an examination for discovery took place under the old Rules, the old “semblance of relevance” test should apply on a refusals motion brought after January 1, 2010. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 4:22 am by Dennis Crouch
The Federal Circuit this week denied two interesting petitions for en banc rehearing: Kingston Technology Company v. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 1:45 am
Summary of Decision issued July 1, 2009Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court.Case Name: McGarvey v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The City appealed.As indicated in an earlier decision a prior decision in this matter (Matter of Rea v City of Kingston, 110 AD3d 1227 [2013]).Rea from Assistant Fire Chief to Fire Chief of the City of Kingston Fire Department in January 2012. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 8:53 am by Dennis Crouch
Kingston Technology Co. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 3:56 am
A settlement of a disciplinary action should be memorialize in writingWinkler v Kingston Housing Auth., 259 AD2d 819A public employee who faces disciplinary charges may enter into a settlement agreement that disposes the charges, so long as the waiver is knowingly and intelligently undertaken and serves as the consideration for the curtailment of pending disciplinary proceedings [see Whitehead v State of New York Department of Mental Hygiene, 71 AD2d 653]. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 10:01 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Cook of Cook, Netter, Cloonan, Kurtz, & Murphy of Kingston represented the city and the police officers. [read post]