Search for: "LITTLE v. HOLDER"
Results 21 - 40
of 1,854
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
For present purposes, however, the important point to understand is that Trump’s primary merits argument, to which he devotes the first 13 pages of the Argument section of his brief (pp. 20-33), concerns only the second, middle “Officials Clause,” which identifies the current and former office-holders to whom Section 3 potentially applies, rather than the government positions that an insurrectionist or rebel is ineligible to occupy going forward. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 4:34 pm
Browne v. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 3:32 am
Consider that a trap for the unwary, because the members’ capital accounts might have little relation to the actual value of the business (especially if many years have passed between the execution of the operating agreement and the capital call). [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 12:50 pm
A little background helps. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 11:00 am
The comparable licences Optis and Apple each produced 19 licences, but because of the heavy redaction little more can be discerned. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 9:26 am
When Canada announced a new program for holders of U.S. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 6:00 am
In Connick v. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 4:22 am
Flor v Greenberg Farrow Architectural Inc. [read post]
9 Dec 2023, 4:12 am
However, the state has previously shown little judgment in making such decisions. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 2:35 am
In recent years, diversity and inclusion (D&I) in the financial services sector has become a focus for regulators around the world. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
., LLC v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 2:08 am
For example, in Rosalba Alassini v. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 3:35 am
Holders of political office are there to pursue their political goals. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 9:23 am
" In Holder v. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 7:50 am
Before starting, here’s a little more background about the three cases: Texas v. [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 10:39 am
This is a little trickier, but a skeptic might say that those holding office during good behavior can depart from office (other than by dying) only when they are impeached (with the impeachment process determining that that are unfit to serve) or when the office holder herself determines that she is unfit to serve (with a possible qualification for stripping the office holder of responsibilities pursuant to rules adopted by the branch within which the office… [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 7:13 am
Winters v. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 5:44 am
Every year after Labor Day, I take a step back to survey the most important current trends and developments in the world of Directors’ and Officers’ liability and insurance. [read post]
2 Sep 2023, 5:23 am
In Netchoice, LLC v. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 2:55 pm
From Judge Timothy Brooks' opinion yesterday in Netchoice, LLC v. [read post]
