Search for: "LOPEZ V. IN RE:" Results 21 - 40 of 430
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Nov 2007, 11:46 pm
Bowley, 435 F.3d 426, 430-31 (3d Cir.2006) (interpreting Lopez-Mendoza as barring sup-pression of evidence of identity), United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2008, 1:45 pm
Lopez, No. 05-0801 Dynegy Midstream Services, L.P. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 3:16 pm
 In California, yes, you have a right to be told why you're being arrested. [read post]
24 May 2021, 4:21 pm by Jennifer Koh
For example, the Supreme Court has repeatedly found certain offenses charged as aggravated felonies—such as one-time drug possession (in Lopez v. [read post]
21 May 2021, 1:41 pm
  They're just talking about the "purposes" of the bill in general. [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 2:05 pm
  One for which we're not even approaching a solution.So we use potentially lengthy periods of incarceration. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 8:48 pm by Sme
Berryhill (10th Cir., June 14, 2017) (reversing and remanding denial of law firm's motion for reconsideration of Judge's Order requiring it to refund Equal Access to Justice Act fees) *Lopez v. [read post]
8 Apr 2007, 3:03 pm
On March 27, 2007 the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit decided In re Lopez, 2007 WL 1128811. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 4:51 am
But Lopez did not support that argument with statistical proof and, therefore, the court did not allow the claim to proceed.The case is Lopez v. [read post]