Search for: "LOWE v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY et al" Results 21 - 31 of 31
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jul 2008, 5:45 pm
Foods that have been sources of contamination include ground beef, venison, sausages, dried (non-cooked) salami, unpasteurized milk and cheese, unpasteurized apple juice and cider (Cody, et al., 1999), orange juice, alfalfa and radish sprouts (Breuer, et al., 2001), lettuce, spinach, and water (Friedman, et al., 1999). [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
See also Manual at 614 n. 198., citing Ofer Shpilberg, et al., The Next Stage: Molecular Epidemiology, 50 J. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 9:01 am by Jeffrey Mitchell
Two grant approvals were recently announced: $2.86 million to a Tennessee electric Co-Op and $9.75 million to Orangeburg County, SC. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Katy Lin & Carroll Doherty, Favorable Views of Supreme Court Fall to Historic Low, Pew Rsch. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 2:18 am
(NBCU) is a media and entertainment company created by the merger of General Electric's (GE) NBC and French Media Group's Vivendi Universal Entertainment (Vivendi). [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm by admin
Most of the communities served by the drinking water treatment plants that will be upgraded under the agreement are in low income communities. [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 1:32 pm by Noble McIntyre
How obvious it is to the general public that the recalled product is deficient. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:37 pm by Steven M. Taber
Motz, to felony obstruction of justice charges and violation of the Act to Prevent Pollution from Ships related to concealing deliberate vessel pollution from the M/V Iorana, a Greek flagged cargo ship that made port calls in Baltimore, Tacoma, Wash., and New Orleans. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 9:00 pm by Kyle Hulehan
The proposed surtax is likely to have negative economic effects that will impact low- and middle-income earners. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 3:18 pm
Section 403(r)(6) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) (21 U.S.C. 343(r)(6)) requires that a manufacturer of a dietary supplement making a nutritional deficiency, structure/function, or general well-being claim have substantiation that the claim is truthful and not misleading. [read post]