Search for: "Lana A. v. State"
Results 21 - 40
of 61
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Oct 2017, 5:30 pm
Gill v. [read post]
21 Aug 2017, 4:00 am
Lana Averette was driving on Highway 1 in Port Allen when she was struck by an Entergy bucket truck driven by an employee of Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, L.L.C. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 3:13 am
For instance, in Texas v. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 1:01 pm
Research was provided by Lana Ulrich. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 1:01 pm
Research was provided by Lana Ulrich. [read post]
31 May 2016, 3:52 am
” At the Bill of Health Blog, Greg Lipper discusses Zubik v. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 2:35 pm
This afternoon the Court granted review in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 4:00 am
Supreme Court in the District of Columbia v. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 2:01 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 5:29 pm
See Robertson v. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 11:19 am
Aero v. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 7:53 am
Plaza Auto Center, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 7:29 am
The court declined to exercise jurisdiction over the plaintiff’s state law claim under the New York Labor Law, which was unaffected by the FLSA exemption that sent the plaintiff’s federal claims into foul territory (Chen v Major League Baseball, March 26, 2014, Koeltl, J). [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 8:35 am
Debord v. [read post]
1 Dec 2013, 1:30 am
The Vancouver Sun reports that the Supreme Court of British Columbia has reserved decision December 16 to 18 for a trial in the case of Margot Bentley v. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 5:34 am
The United States argued that Richard and Lana Vento and their daughters (collectively, "The Ventos") were required to file those returns with the IRS instead. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 7:45 am
TEGELER v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 2:51 pm
Rice v. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 6:00 am
Case information: George v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 10:05 am
Mr Justice Silber then considered the case law and relied on Lana v Positive Action Training Housing (London) [2001] IRLR 501 which states that the test of authority is whether when doing a discriminatory act the discriminator was exercising authority conferred by the Principal, and not whether the Principal had authorised the agents to discriminate. [read post]
