Search for: "Leahy v. Hill" Results 21 - 40 of 50
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2023, 6:05 am by John Ramming Chappell
  Section 502B originated as a major legislative outcome of human rights oversight efforts on Capitol Hill in the wake of Watergate and the Vietnam War, but Congress has underutilized the oversight tool in recent decades. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 1:27 pm by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
Michigan Court Rules that Juveniles Sentenced to Life Have Right to Parole: A year after the ACLU filed suit in Hill v. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 7:16 am by Amanda Rice
  Sara Jerome of The Hill, Tony Mauro (for the First Amendment Center), and  Nathaniel Hindman of the Huffington Post discuss FCC v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 7:11 am by Jay Willis
” On Capitol Hill, John Stanton of Roll Call reports on Senator Leahy’s comments on Monday, in which he accused Republican senators of imposing a “judicial litmus test” and demanding “justices who will guarantee the results they want. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 7:54 am by Anna Christensen
”  Susan Crabtree, writing for The Hill, analyzes Leahy’s comparison between the two cases, while The BLT quotes Leahy as saying that the decision “shows no respect for the rule of law. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 1:48 pm by Peter Briccetti
Hill staffers say that no pharmaceutical lobbyists approached them before last Thursday. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 6:39 am by Adam Chandler
” The Hill has a story on abortion protesters who appear regularly at the Supreme Court. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:55 am by Marie Louise
Scurmont LLC (Property, intangible)   US Trade Marks – Lawsuits and strategic steps Mar Hill Church – Seattle’s Mars Hill Church in second trademark scrape (Seattle Trademark Lawyer) [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 6:39 am by Anna Christensen
  Looking forward, the New York Times reports on next week’s upcoming argument in Monsanto Co. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 6:55 am by Adam Chandler
”  Kerr analyzes the reply brief in one such case—City of Ontario v. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
As a matter of reality on the Hill at this point, it appears clear (at least for now) that Chief Justice Roberts will not preside at Trump’s second trial. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 7:00 pm
– Facebook’s contractual rights to users’ photos problematic: (Spicy IP)PharmaEuropean Commission probes pharmaceutical sector: (Philip Brooks),WHO Board sets course on IP, avian flu, tighter publication policy: (Intellectual Property Watch),India: The Competition Act, patents and over hyped drugs: (Part I - Spicy IP), (Part II – Spicy IP), (Part III – Spicy IP),Ignoring not the solution –… [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 6:02 pm by Duncan
Highlights this week included: Supreme Court re-opens door for patentability of business methods in Bilski v. [read post]