Search for: "Lee v. Smith, II" Results 21 - 40 of 109
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Dec 2013, 6:36 am by Marty Lederman
  Individuals generally receive such coverage in one of four ways:  (i) through Medicaid, if they’re eligible; (ii) through Medicare, if they’re eligible; (iii) through an employer-provided insurance plan, if their employer offers one; or (iv) on the government “exchange,” if the individual is not covered in one of the other three ways. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 8:22 am by Kedar
In 1991, the firm split and Farr joined Paul Smith and Richard Taranto to form Klein, Farr, Smith & Taranto. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 1:39 am
In this guest piece, Andy Lee (Brandsmiths) reflects upon how the worst effects of the new England and Wales recently-increased court fees might be mitigated. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 5:00 am by Marc DeGirolami
Smith, “Liberalism and Hate Speech,” Law and Religion Forum (2022)   Week 10, Thursday, April 13: Compelled Speech and Association West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 5:36 pm by Schachtman
Schering Health Care Ltd., [2002] EWHC 1420, at ¶ 21 (QB), (2002) 70 BMLR 88 Smith v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 4:29 am by Marie Louise
– Beijing First Intermediate People’s Court accepts admin lawsuit lodged by Louis Vuitton against China Trademark Review and Adjudication Board (China Law Insight) Core IP issues in M&A and investment (Part II of II) (China Law Insight) ‘Patent Litigation in China’ The book. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
Research and Resources Delfi v Estonia: ISPs and the freedom to impart information, Christina Angelopoulos, IPKat Blog Commercialising Privacy and Privatising the Commercial: The Difficulties Arising from the Protection of Privacy via Breach of Confidence,  A Kur, N Lee, A Ohly and G Westkamp (eds), Intellectual Property, Unfair Competition and Publicity – Convergence and Development EIPIN Series Vol II (Edward Elgar, 2014),  Tanya… [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 3:55 am by Ben
Those pesky TurtlesIt seems SiriusXM has decided to rely on the 1940 case of  RCA v Whiteman et al to persuade  U.S. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 10:04 am by Schachtman
Kan. 2002) (acknowledging that most courts require a showing of RR > 2, but questioning their reasoning), aff’d, 356 F. 3d 1326 (10th Cir. 2004) Smith v. [read post]