Search for: "Legrand v. United States" Results 21 - 40 of 83
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Oct 2014, 6:00 am by Jon Robinson
  The district director, Benefits Review Board, and the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit disagreed. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 6:00 am by Trevor Cutaiar
Judge Clement first analyzed and concluded that United States Supreme Court jurisprudence does not require punitive damages in unseaworthiness cases. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm by Schachtman
That goal ultimately came to have bipartisan support in the United States, largely as a result of Selikoff’s advocacy. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 6:00 am by Jon Robinson
  First of all, the Third Circuit made clear in its en banc decision in Dunn v. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 6:00 am by Caitlin Byars
Fallon of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana denied a Motion for Summary Judgement on the issue of respondeat superior in the case of Bittel v. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 6:00 am by Cassie Preston
Claimant appealed the District Director’s lien on compensation to the United States Court of Appeal for the Fifth Circuit. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 6:00 am by Dan Hoerner
Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit (based in Cincinnati, Ohio) in United States v. [read post]
5 May 2014, 8:04 am by Jon Robinson
The Supreme Court of the United States refused certiorari in Jackson v. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 6:00 am by Jon Robinson
On April 18, 2014, counsel for Jennifer Dize, the personal representative of the Estate of William Smith Dize, filed a interesting and very well-written petition for certiorari in the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 6:00 am by Jon Robinson
  Upon returning to the United States in June 2006, he learned that his wife had committed adultery while he was away, and that his daughter developed a drug problem. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 8:00 am by Jon Robinson
United States, 993 F.2d 211, 213 (11th Cir. 1993) (“[I]n order to recover damages under the Jones Act, [a plaintiff] must have the status of a seaman. [read post]