Search for: "Lehr v. Lehr" Results 21 - 40 of 129
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Oct 2021, 4:54 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
Vacuum Corp., 186 AD3d 1094 [4th Dept 2020] [“By filing that election form, Lehr—who admitted that it was his signature on the form—[is] thereby estopped from denying Rizzo’s ownership interest”]; and PH-105 Realty Corp v Elayaan, 183 AD3d 492 [1st Dept 2020] [“The court improvidently exercised its discretion in failing to apply the doctrine of ‘tax estoppel. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 8:02 am by admin
Decision issued September 8, 2020: “Goren v Barnett” — “From 2010 to approximately 2013, the law firm of Amstein & Lehr LLP (Arnstein & Lehr) represented the Regional Center as securities counsel in various matters related to its EB-5 program administered by the United States Citizen and Immigration Services. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 2:32 pm by Olivia Cross
By: Michael Lehr Lehr is an associate at Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig’s Richmond, Virginia office. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 2:32 pm by Olivia Cross
The Supreme Court stated this conclusion nearly one hundred years ago in Local Loan Co. v. [read post]
Under normal circumstances, the HR department represents the interests of the company in dealing with employee complaints, including external inquiries such as Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) charges and lawsuits. [read post]
Under normal circumstances, the HR department represents the interests of the company in dealing with employee complaints, including external inquiries such as Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) charges and lawsuits. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:40 pm by The Regulatory Review
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Endrew F. v. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:40 pm by The Regulatory Review
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Endrew F. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 8:53 am by Lindsay Griffiths
Tam – Disparaging Trademarks are Registrable from Shutts & Bowen (US) Properly Maintaining Personnel Files from Arnstein & Lehr (US) Can you claim solicitor-client privilege against your own insurer? [read post]
21 May 2017, 9:30 pm by Cary Coglianese
Turning to due process, the longstanding test found in the Supreme Court’s decision in Mathews v. [read post]