Search for: "Lemley v. Lemley" Results 21 - 40 of 568
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Apr 2008, 5:45 am
[On a less disguised Lemley flip-flop, recall Lemley switches sides in KSR v. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 6:56 am by Dennis Crouch
The Federal Circuit is hearing oral arguments today in the design patent case of  LKQ Corporation v. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 9:33 am
Jurisdiction Defendants Ross Chanin, ReputationDefender, Mark Lemley, and Heide Iravani asserted that they lacked the minimum contacts required for the exercise of personal jurisdiction over them in Pennsylvania. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 2:16 pm
Gene Quinn notes that oral argument in USPTO v. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 4:47 am
Soc'y 743 (2006), which includes footnote 8:At some level, the use of the word "continuation" to mean more than one thing reminds one of Raffles v. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 11:25 pm
[But of Lemley/Moore and the rules, see Comments on continuation practice proposal appearing in the Federal Register (Jan. 2006) ] See also Law Review on continuation application issue Ta-tah to Quillen/Webster/Lemley? [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 12:38 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Although doctrines like Rogers v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 3:43 pm by Derek Bambauer
Mark Lemley has a smart editorial up at Law.com on the hearings at the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in Viacom v. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 4:33 am by Anthony McCain
Lemley: Ready For Patenting JC Torres: Google Has A Thing For Eyewear Andrew Williams: Amgen v. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 5:37 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
The 16 Nov 2015 installment of Akamai v. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 2:42 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Back in 2011, IPBiz had commented on Lemley's response to Katznelson in the post Mark Lemley strikes back, related to issues expressed in Lemley's "Myth of the Sole Inventor. [read post]
12 Oct 2012, 10:01 am by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
(Which is not to say that Lemley's solution is right as a policy matter—as I said before, I would want to see some discussion of how it would apply in actual cases, which is currently lacking from Lemley's draft.)Stay tuned: as amicus briefs for CLS Bank come in and as scholars debate these ideas at Santa Clara's conference in November, I'm sure there will be much more commentary on software patents in the coming months! [read post]