Search for: "Lemley v. State"
Results 21 - 40
of 340
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2023, 1:27 pm
LTTB v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:37 am
Compare LVL XIII Brands, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 12:36 pm
In 2016, Leonard v. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 9:40 am
Victoria’s Secret v. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 1:42 pm
The outcome of the case was that LKQ (represented by Mark Lemley; MARK A. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 2:17 pm
Articles about the First Amendment, state constitutional free speech provisions, federal and state statutes, common-law rules, and regulations protecting or restricting speech, or private organizations' speech regulations. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 11:37 am
Corp. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 2:39 pm
Sarnoff, BIO v. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 12:31 pm
The United States Supreme Court is engaged in behavior never before seen in American history argues Mark Lemley, the William H. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 8:43 am
HDT Bio Corp v. [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 9:40 am
Light Co. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 5:01 am
This is part V in a series of posts discussing First Amendment Limits on State Laws Targeting Election Misinformation, 20 First Amend. [read post]
27 Aug 2022, 11:02 am
In the course of this work I encountered Section 1905 in the following way.There was, and still is, a federal law on the books enacted in 2007 called the Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act that mandates that important information from the majority of significant clinical trials run in the United States be published on the National Institute of Health (NIH) website. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 7:23 am
In a different case involving Zoominfo, Rebecca Tushnet and Mark Lemley will be filing an amicus brief on this point. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 3:44 pm
Cahn v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 4:36 am
Registration v. acquisition is also a big deal. [read post]
4 Jun 2022, 8:35 am
" In the same footnote, Nokia explains that one can deduce from the findings of fact and conclusions of law in FTC v. [read post]
25 May 2022, 8:16 am
especially a nice dinnerTo be protected a belief must relate to matters which a more than merely trivial, possess an adequate degree of seriousness and it must be a belief on a fundamental problem (R (Williamson) v Secretary of State for Education, paragraph 23), although the belief does not need to govern the entirety of a person’s life (Grainger v Nicholson, paragraph 27).In the initial Employment Tribunal decision in Gray, the Tribunal did not accept that Ms… [read post]
13 May 2022, 10:39 am
See Wong v. [read post]
15 Mar 2022, 8:47 am
Most political leaders want to regulate the largest social media platforms to deal with the current misinformation and bias problems, but a veritable who’s who of internet law scholars (such as Jack Balkin, Daphne Keller, Mark Lemley and Ashutosh Bhagwat) have pointed out that politicians want contradictory things: more content removal and less content removal. [read post]
