Search for: "Lilly v. United States Lines Co." Results 21 - 40 of 53
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2013, 8:40 am
Reciting Seager v Copydex and Banks v EMI Songs, the former judge stated that 'where an inventor wanted to sell his idea for money, money is what he got'. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 6:50 am by Andrew Frisch
United Air Lines, Inc., 94 F.R.D. 304, 305 (N.D.Ill.1982) (considering how long after the deadline the consent forms were filed); but see Reyes v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 4:09 pm
Eli Lilly & Co., 199 F.3d 1559, 1568 (Fed. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm by Bexis
 At least the state of the art at the time of the plaintiff’s use applies – unknown and later discovered risks are irrelevant. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 10:34 am by Beck, et al.
Because those are federal statutes, they can’t be “preempted” the way state-law claims were in Buckman Co. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 11:56 am
Part V identifies key unresolved issues in the state courts. [read post]