Search for: "Line v. Rouse"
Results 21 - 40
of 71
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Nov 2010, 5:16 am
In reaching this conclusion he leant strongly on the Right to free and fair elections under the ECHR, accepting that under s. 2(1) of the European Convention on Human Rights Act he had a duty to interpret the Electoral Act in line with this right. [read post]
29 Sep 2022, 9:48 am
Rouse’s Enter., LLC, 15-484 (La. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 3:04 am
Unfortunately, like all prayers, this incantation serves no greater purpose than a rousing recital on a sinking ship. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 7:52 am
” At ACSblog, Charlotte Garden discusses Friedrichs v. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 5:42 am
Whether that deserves to be called a "civics lecture" or not, it did rouse Ruth Bader Ginsburg. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 3:29 pm
Justice Sotomayor repeated this same five-year line in 303 Creative v. [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 1:01 pm
This is reminiscent of the test laid out in Brandenburg v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 11:00 pm
Unfortunately, like all prayers, this incantation serves no greater purpose than a rousing recital on a sinking ship. [read post]
5 Jul 2008, 11:05 am
: (IP tango), China: Pfizer loses trade mark action against Jaingsu Lianhuan Pharmaceutical Co over 3D mark: (Rouse & Co International), India: More patents for new forms issued to generics: (Patent Circle), India: Gauri Kamath on drug ‘differential pricing’ in India: (Spicy IP), Mexico: Revised health supplies regulations promise changes for generics: (International Law Office), US: World drug pricing crisis: Congressmen criticise US Trade Representative over… [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 1:00 am
- Counterfeit cash flooding the market: (Afro-IP), Debranded fakes for Liberia: an update: (Afro-IP), South African music industry blames pirates for falling sales of local artists: (Afro-IP), Plaintiff obtains interlocutory relief in patent case Sanitam Services Limited v Bins (Nairobi) Services Limited: (Afro-IP), South Africa – new patent judgments: Buckman Laboratories v Bromine Compounds; Northpark Trading 3 (Pty) Ltd v Ausplow (Pty) Ltd:… [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 2:05 am
He quickly calmed our nerves and by the end of the session had us all strutting the room as if we were on stage at the Theatre Royal, bellowing lines from Shakespeare’s Henry V. [read post]
8 Jun 2019, 7:55 am
D-Day should never be mentioned in a line or two as an afterthought on a post about some pedantic local politics. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 3:08 pm
California (07-11073) and Zamudio v. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 9:55 am
By invoking a later Lochner-era case, Eisner v. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 7:58 am
Evans v. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 8:12 am
Michigan Ave., Suite 240Chicago, IL 60601Voice Phone (312)886-2359FAX (312)886-1807TDD (312)353-5693Region VI - Dallas (Arkansas, Louisiana, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Texas)Ralph Rouse, Regional ManagerOffice for Civil RightsU.S. [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 12:54 am
: (Holman’s Biotech IP Blog), Daiichi’s open offer for 20% in Ranbaxy awaits Sebi nod: (GenericsWeb), Australia/India: Strides shows thumbs up for Indian generic industry acquiring controlling interest in Ascent: (Spicy IP), Europe: Significant date ahead for EU Paediatric Regulation: (SPC Blog), India: Grave diggers, ‘immoral’ patent and the National Biotech Regulatory Authority: (Spicy IP), UK: Monster trade mark infringement case: court reveals its thinking… [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 9:02 pm
In the case of United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC sets strict standards to establish inequitable conduct: Star Scientific v R J Reynolds Tobacco: (Hal Wegner), (Maryland Intellectual Property Law Blog), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (Patently-O), (more from Patently-O), (Philip Brooks), (Law360), (I/P Updates), Safe harbour ruling in Io v Veoh could help YouTube in Viacom… [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 7:35 am
As Judge Weinstein notes: Those who would limit the powers historically exercised by juries must now consider the Supreme Court’s Booker-Apprendi line of sentencing decisions, see United States v. [read post]
