Search for: "Link Snacks, Inc. v. Link "
Results 21 - 40
of 42
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jul 2010, 2:51 am
Briefs and other papers for these cases may be found at TTABVUE via the links provided.July 13 - 10 AM: Rocket Trademarks Pty Ltd. v. [read post]
1 May 2009, 3:30 am
Briefs and other papers for these cases may be found at TTABVUE via the links provided.May 5, 2009 - 2 PM: In re Kathy Sayah, Serial No. 76486273 [Refusal to register the design shown below for "advertising agency namely, promoting the services of the travel, entertainment, and restaurant industry through the distribution of printed promotional materials, rendering sales promotion advice, and dissemination of advertising matter" and for "printing services," on the ground… [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 7:13 am
As Jeremy explains, it deals with the ‘Kit Kat’ chocolate-snack and its protection as trade mark.* A taste of things to come? [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 7:51 pm
Mainly because I just read Links Snacks, Inc. v. [read post]
15 May 2015, 10:05 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 3:39 am
”] November 10, 2021 - 1 PM: American Marriage Ministries v. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 1:31 pm
Circuit, denied an en banc reconsideration [See WIMS 1/16/13] of Grocery Manufacturers Association v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 2:44 pm
(PatLit) Trade Marks and innovation: how strong is the link? [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 2:37 pm
See Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. and Homer TLC, Inc. v. [read post]
2 May 2013, 2:22 am
Miller v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:56 am
Delaware Tetra Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 10:29 am
NEGLIGENCEGetting specific about the duty to warnDing v Canam Super Vacation Inc, 2024 BCCA 102How specific does a dangerous product warning need to be? [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
Please do not ask to have any links "corrected" because the links are not mistakes, they simply demonstrate that personal branding is as important as corporate branding. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 11:27 am
Links from Law360, subsc. req’d. *** FDA PFAS in Food? [read post]
9 Dec 2017, 1:07 am
Trees, Inc.). [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 7:01 am
Amgen Inc., et al., 15-1039 and Amgen Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 4:45 am
KIND LLC v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 5:00 am
And the Windsurfing test (Windsurfing International Inc. v Tabur Marine (Great Britain) Ltd [1985] RPC 59 (at 73) was mentioned to see whether the patent is obvious or not. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 1:51 pm
John Welch wrote about this as far back as 2005: In [] J&J Snack Foods [Corp. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 9:05 pm
Breakfast food, cookies and crackers are also in demand, according to Mondelez International Inc. [read post]
