Search for: "List of ORDERS ON PETITIONS FOR FURTHER REVIEW FILED August 6, 2013."
Results 21 - 40
of 61
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2020, 2:30 pm
Brandes titled "Navigating the Matrimonial Preliminary Conference So You Don’t Sink the Ship". appears in the New York State Bar Association Family Law Review, Winter 2020, Vol. 52, No. 1. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 2:44 am
A: Just like Google, Oracle could request a rehearing and file a petition for writ of certiorari with the Supreme Court.Q: Why has this copyright case been appealed to the Federal Circuit, not the Ninth Circuit, and what standard of appellate review will be applied to the key issues? [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 9:27 am
The child was 13 years old, and had no adjudicated father and no father listed on his birth certificate. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 2:55 pm
Deborah sought an interlocutory order to remove Robert as Trustee immediately which was denied in March 2013. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 6:49 am
Opinion issued August 22, 2017. [read post]
19 May 2017, 12:23 pm
Standard of Review We review summary judgments de novo. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 12:36 am
”[24] From 2013 hundreds of people in Russia faced administrative charges [25] and one of them became Yulia Tsvetkova. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
Petition for review after the Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal in an action for writ of administrative mandate. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm
Figure 6: II. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 8:25 am
The case was remanded for further proceedings. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 12:03 pm
It was published on December 13, so it becomes final on January 12, and the deadline for one of the parties to file a petition for review with the California Supreme Court is January 22. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 6:39 am
The board held oral proceedings on 3 August 2017. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 8:16 pm
EB-2: India advanced by nearly 6 months to January 1, 2013, and China advanced by more than 5 weeks to March 1, 2019. [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 9:56 am
Defendant failed to file a Response opposing Plaintiff's Motion.After reviewing the attached billing invoices and Mr. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 5:44 am
This year’s review is set out below. [read post]
2 Sep 2017, 1:41 pm
Paul's rector on a number of occasions (pp. 5-6, and 30-33). [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 3:41 pm
NCSLT 2005-3, the reviewing panel did not even give the debtors credit for the payment that they had made over the course of several years. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 2:11 pm
Opinion Filed July 31, 2015. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 5:01 pm
Further, the data analyzed by NFAP indicates that the stark increase in denials and delays is even greater for visa petition beneficiaries from India.[6] One of the results of this adjudicatory trend is a significant decrease in the number of L-1 visa petition filings with the USCIS Service Centers.[7] A review of recent RFEs and denials issued by the USCIS shows that the current theme in L-1 adjudications follows the following principles:… [read post]
