Search for: "List of ORDERS ON PETITIONS FOR FURTHER REVIEW FILED December 14, 2010."
Results 21 - 40
of 69
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Oct 2017, 11:39 pm
-Austin Aug. 25, 2010, pet. denied) (mem. op.); McFarland v. [read post]
19 May 2017, 12:23 pm
No. 13-14-00091-CV. [read post]
19 May 2017, 12:23 pm
Standard of Review We review summary judgments de novo. [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 5:29 pm
A method for petitioning that focuses on administrative obligation was suggested--and it was an excellent part of the report--but the solutions were oriented toward mechanics that might have been more helpful had they been better contextualized (e.g., on my review of the new foreign NGO law). [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 10:40 am
Polygram case from 2003, in which the FTC successfully pursued two competitors’ agreements to restrict advertising of old stock in order to prop up a new product release. [read post]
14 May 2016, 3:00 am
In June 2013, petitioner sought to review her personnel file and discovered that all of her satisfactory written formal and informal observations from the 2010-11 and 2011-12 school years were missing. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 7:28 pm
Eighteen states, while arguing that the district courts had jurisdiction to hear their claims, filed protective petitions for review in their respective circuit courts. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 5:30 am
The next day, on December 10, 2011, at the request of Dean of Students David Baum, the LawClosed list was disabled. . . .Enjaian v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 10:59 am
Petition for review granted. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 6:46 pm
Grayson, 438 U.S. 41, 45-46, 98 S.Ct. 2610, 2613-14, 57 L.Ed.2d 582 (1978). [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am
Petition for review after the Court of Appeal granted a petition for peremptory writ of mandate. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:30 pm
Petition for review after the Court of Appeal granted a petition for peremptory writ of mandate. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 8:01 pm
Further, the data analyzed by NFAP indicates that the stark increase in denials and delays is even greater for visa petition beneficiaries from India.[6] One of the results of this adjudicatory trend is a significant decrease in the number of L-1 visa petition filings with the USCIS Service Centers.[7] A review of recent RFEs and denials issued by the USCIS shows that the current theme in L-1 adjudications follows the following principles: Qualifying… [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 8:01 pm
Further, the data analyzed by NFAP indicates that the stark increase in denials and delays is even greater for visa petition beneficiaries from India.[6] One of the results of this adjudicatory trend is a significant decrease in the number of L-1 visa petition filings with the USCIS Service Centers.[7] A review of recent RFEs and denials issued by the USCIS shows that the current theme in L-1 adjudications follows the following principles: Qualifying… [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 5:01 pm
Further, the data analyzed by NFAP indicates that the stark increase in denials and delays is even greater for visa petition beneficiaries from India.[6] One of the results of this adjudicatory trend is a significant decrease in the number of L-1 visa petition filings with the USCIS Service Centers.[7] A review of recent RFEs and denials issued by the USCIS shows that the current theme in L-1 adjudications follows the following principles: Qualifying… [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 7:02 am
Both the list of posts and the posts themselves are listed in chronological order within each section of the book. [read post]
15 May 2013, 6:55 am
The CSSA provides for no other option and vests the court with no discretion to order payment in the other direction. [read post]
1 May 2013, 8:56 pm
District Court Judge James Robertson granting Slahi’s habeas corpus petition and ordering his release. [read post]
11 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm
On December 3, 2010, the patent proprietor filed an expert opinion by Prof. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 9:32 am
See Order at 14-15. [read post]
