Search for: "List of ORDERS ON PETITIONS FOR FURTHER REVIEW FILED February 24, 2010"
Results 21 - 40
of 51
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2016, 3:00 am
In June 2013, petitioner sought to review her personnel file and discovered that all of her satisfactory written formal and informal observations from the 2010-11 and 2011-12 school years were missing. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 7:34 am
-Houston [1st Dist.] 2010, no pet.). [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 9:20 am
ALJ Order, slip op. at 2, (July 24, 2013)(citing Societe Nationale Industrielle Aerospatiale, 482 U.S. at 541). [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 5:00 am
This timing compares to the first bladder cancer “claim [being] made known to the company” in September, 2010; and “the first bladder lawsuit was filed during the summer of July 2011. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 8:01 pm
(Policy) Response: USCIS continues to review the issues related to the interpretation of “specialized knowledge,” and is considering AILA’s memorandum of January 24, 2012 as part of this review.[3] The February 2012 NFAP Policy Brief cited by AILA provided an analysis of data that revealed high denial rates for L-1 and H-1B petitions at the USCIS. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 8:01 pm
(Policy) Response: USCIS continues to review the issues related to the interpretation of “specialized knowledge,” and is considering AILA’s memorandum of January 24, 2012 as part of this review.[3] The February 2012 NFAP Policy Brief cited by AILA provided an analysis of data that revealed high denial rates for L-1 and H-1B petitions at the USCIS. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 5:01 pm
(Policy) Response: USCIS continues to review the issues related to the interpretation of “specialized knowledge,” and is considering AILA’s memorandum of January 24, 2012 as part of this review.[3] The February 2012 NFAP Policy Brief cited by AILA provided an analysis of data that revealed high denial rates for L-1 and H-1B petitions at the USCIS. [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 7:02 am
Both the list of posts and the posts themselves are listed in chronological order within each section of the book. [read post]
15 May 2013, 6:55 am
The CSSA provides for no other option and vests the court with no discretion to order payment in the other direction. [read post]
11 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm
On December 3, 2010, the patent proprietor filed an expert opinion by Prof. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 6:13 pm
Footnote 1 This case was filed prior to the 2009 addition of section 51.016 to the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code expanding state court interlocutory review of certain FAA arbitration matters. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 6:13 pm
Footnote 1 This case was filed prior to the 2009 addition of section 51.016 to the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code expanding state court interlocutory review of certain FAA arbitration matters. [read post]
18 Sep 2011, 8:21 pm
In Chapter Three we reviewed some Google search results and tried to chase down different entities. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 10:48 pm
Mullin's work there occurred in the period from December 2009 to February 2010, with another 24 hours logged in August 2010. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 9:43 am
Petition denied with directions. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 8:47 am
After plaintiffs filed a complaint for gender discrimination, sexual harassment, and retaliation, defendants filed a petition to compel arbitration, which the court granted. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 6:33 pm
Meanwhile, Lannett submitted its own NDA to FDA for Morphine Sulfate Solution Immediate-Release 20mg/mL in late February 2010. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 3:02 pm
Most readers of this blog are certainly aware of the fact that petitions for review hardly ever succeed. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 7:28 am
Any petition for review shall be filed within 60 days from the date this notice appears in the Federal Register, pursuant to section 307 of the Act. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:18 pm
A further hearing took place on 2nd June 2010, listed as Re X, at which the order was continued. [read post]
