Search for: "Local Trademarks v. Powers"
Results 21 - 40
of 260
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jan 2022, 7:36 am
The Court had said "no substantive trademark law," that exceeded Congress' limited Commerce Clause powers. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 5:01 am
id=62ac2fc048370f4c2c31b714 ALLEGEDLY INFRINGING URLS: https://conlinpa.com/2016/04/03/hyman-v-daoud/ As you might gather, you can't stop people from writing about you by registering your name as a trademark. [* * *] Here's that post from last week: I wrote about Hyman v. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 6:32 am
Wickard v. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 6:53 am
Bimbo Bakeries USA, Inc. v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 1:34 pm
Chick-fil-a’s Eat Mor Chikn v. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 11:22 pm
Your local state court — where traditional power usually stops at the state line — simply may not have the power to make a binding ruling over an online seller based in another state hundreds of miles away. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 7:53 am
In Van Cleef & Arpels Logistics, S.A. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 6:13 am
That happened recently in Bowman v. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 7:13 am
Lisa Ramsey, Reconciling Trademark Rights and Free Speech Locally and Globally Commentator: Rebecca Tushnet International element to the question of how to limit trademark to protect free speech. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 5:56 am
OHG v. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 2:40 pm
Professor Chon spoke to trademark goodwill as a public good, on brands and innovation in CSR. [read post]
14 Nov 2010, 12:16 am
In Marks v. [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 10:36 am
A TM system that rewards advertising will give more power to brands than to retailers. [read post]
20 May 2016, 11:20 am
The Ford decision is reported at Columbia Motor Car Co. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 8:08 am
Lee v. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 8:46 pm
Sarnoff, BIO v. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 1:29 pm
The First Amendment does not entrust that power to the government’s benevolence. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 10:14 am
Note 2: Margarine Reference (seminal case on federal powers) | UL Canada v Quebec (2005 case) | CBC summary of the history of margarine in Canada. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 11:07 am
§ 1125(a)(1)(B), abuse their monopoly power under § 2 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. [read post]
5 Nov 2016, 1:14 pm
,col. 4, lines 24–39 (particular embodiment allowing “thefree passage air from any locale beneath the shelter toany other locale”) (emphasis added). [read post]
