Search for: "Lock v. Secretary of Health & Human Services"
Results 21 - 28
of 28
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
December 29, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
29 Dec 2009, 5:46 pm
— Occupational Health & Safety, December 21, 2009 The Solano County Office of Emergency Services has received $109,062 in emergency response equipment as the result of a settlement reached by the U.S. [read post]
December 29, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
29 Dec 2009, 5:50 pm
— Occupational Health & Safety, December 21, 2009 The Solano County Office of Emergency Services has received $109,062 in emergency response equipment as the result of a settlement reached by the U.S. [read post]
27 Apr 2019, 7:00 am
The individual does not have the authority to waive that privilege, and agency regulations, called Touhy regulations after the Supreme Court case Touhy v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am
– Trading Markets.com, July 21, 2010 Consistent with Section 122 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. 9622(d), and 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on July 16, 2010, the United States lodged a Consent Decree with 163 defendants (each of which is identified in the proposed Decree) in United States of America v. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 9:16 am
"); Benito Mussolini The doctrine of Fascism 1932 ("For the Fascist, everything is within the State; and nothing human or spiritual exists, much less has value, outside the state")). [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm
The recent self-disclosure cases had potential penalties ranging from $18,900 to $192,400 for environmental violations that the agency determined caused no serious or actual harm to human health or the environment. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am
Mitch McConnell’s campaign Twitter account, Team Mitch, has been locked out. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 5:48 pm
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held in State of Connecticut v. [read post]
