Search for: "Long Is. Univ. v Smith" Results 21 - 40 of 59
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Oct 2014, 12:26 pm by Stephen Bilkis
This argument is foreclosed by the mother having taken a contrary position before Supreme Court when she affirmatively opposed the father's pretrial motion for the appointment of an attorney for the child as in Mikkelson v Kessler, Maas v Cornell Univ. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 9:45 pm by Law Lady
Plaintiffs Helen Pitts, 78, Kenneth Roman, 47, Denise Hodges, 53, and Ricki Ainey 30, filed a class-action lawsuit, asserting the state's Department of Health and Hospitals is poised to slash its long-term personal care services program to help shore up a $1.6 million budget. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 6:15 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Univ. of Chicago, 441 U.S. 677, 698-99 (1979) (holding that the Court’s “evaluation of congressional action in 1972 must take into account its contemporary legal context”); see also Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 5:02 am by Eugene Volokh
Stephen Smith (Santa Clara Univ.): In fact, this is not a run-of-the-mill closure case, because it's in Pennsylvania. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 12:44 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The presence or absence of probable cause—defined as such grounds as would induce an ordinarily prudent and cautious person, under the circumstances, to believe that plaintiff had committed the crimes as held in Smith v County of Nassau—can be decided as a matter of law where the facts leading up to an arrest and inferences to be drawn therefrom are not in dispute based on Parkin v Cornell Univ. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 5:51 am by Eugene Volokh
Bd. of Trustees of Univ. of Ala., 104 F.3d 1453, 1464 (4th Cir. 1997) (“where the core of the state law theory of recovery … goes to wrongful copying, … it is preempted”); Daboub v. [read post]
7 Sep 2013, 2:36 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The presence or absence of probable cause—defined as such grounds as would induce an ordinarily prudent and cautious person, under the circumstances, to believe that plaintiff had committed the crimes as held in Smith v County of Nassau—can be decided as a matter of law where the facts leading up to an arrest and inferences to be drawn therefrom are not in dispute based on Parkin v Cornell Univ. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm by John Dean
While there is a so-called “political question” doctrine, first established in Luther v. [read post]