Search for: "Long v. California"
Results 21 - 40
of 10,897
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2024, 9:26 pm
In Trump v. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 10:00 pm
See Naranjo v. [read post]
31 May 2024, 2:08 pm
Supreme Court delivered a major victory for free speech and struck a blow against government censorship-by-proxy yesterday in NRA v. [read post]
31 May 2024, 4:30 am
On May 9, 2024, in the matter of Jason Kim v. [read post]
30 May 2024, 11:15 am
"The California Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court's decision.Yamasaki et al. v. [read post]
29 May 2024, 9:01 pm
Long settled and established practice may have great weight in interpreting constitutional provisions about the operation of government. [read post]
29 May 2024, 10:30 am
International Corp. v. [read post]
27 May 2024, 10:00 pm
See Maia v. [read post]
26 May 2024, 9:44 am
Centeno v. [read post]
24 May 2024, 7:17 am
The myth of a “bright line rule” that privacy cannot not attach to public places was judicially debunked long ago (see Stoute v NGN [2024] 1 All ER 818, [36]). [read post]
23 May 2024, 3:00 am
(Brian van der Brug / Los Angeles Times) Ryan King, a spokesman for the office of the University of California’s president, Michael V. [read post]
22 May 2024, 10:13 am
The plaintiff will now get to enjoy some California hospitality until his case is inevitably dismissed by N.D. [read post]
22 May 2024, 9:20 am
At the same time, the decision departs somewhat from the several California cases, including Cubic Corp. v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 10:00 pm
See Savage v. [read post]
19 May 2024, 9:05 pm
Aug 29, 2023 | Could West Virginia v EPA Strengthen State Climate Laws | Scholars argue that a recent Supreme Court decision may bolster state climate lawsuits. [read post]
17 May 2024, 9:16 am
, Bradford v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 8:36 am
The post X Corp. v. [read post]
16 May 2024, 12:11 pm
Case 1: Baldessari Trust v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 10:57 am
See, e.g., U.S. v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 10:00 am
District Court for the Northern District of California decided a dispute over long-term disability (LTD) benefits. [read post]