Search for: "Long v. US Dept. of Justice"
Results 21 - 40
of 345
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2015, 9:00 pm
As Justice Powell pointed out long ago, this test is limited only by the scope of a Justice’s imagination. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 9:00 pm
As Justice Powell pointed out long ago, this test is limited only by the scope of a Justice’s imagination. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 7:40 pm
In Cherry v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:00 am
"[A]n arbitrator 'exceed[s] [their] power' under the meaning of the statute where [their] 'award violates a strong public policy, is irrational or clearly exceeds a specifically enumerated limitation on the arbitrator's power' " (id.), or where the arbitrator " 'manifestly disregard[s]' the substantive law applicable to the parties' dispute" (Schiferle v Capital Fence Co., Inc., 155 AD3d 122, 127 [4th Dept 2017],… [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:00 am
"[A]n arbitrator 'exceed[s] [their] power' under the meaning of the statute where [their] 'award violates a strong public policy, is irrational or clearly exceeds a specifically enumerated limitation on the arbitrator's power' " (id.), or where the arbitrator " 'manifestly disregard[s]' the substantive law applicable to the parties' dispute" (Schiferle v Capital Fence Co., Inc., 155 AD3d 122, 127 [4th Dept 2017],… [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 5:01 am
In Fitzpatrick v. [read post]
9 May 2009, 6:45 am
The State Legislature has approved the expanded use of red light cameras in Long Island. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 7:33 am
Langan(2nd Dept., decided 9/16/2008)Would forgetting something that happened five years ago constitute a short-term or long-term memory loss? [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 9:01 pm
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 3:56 pm
Dept. of Justice Attorney Office provoked a dissent and appears to be at odds with the decisions of several other courts, although no other circuit court has squarely addressed this question in a published opinion. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 2:48 am
Term 2d Dept. 2009); Schwartz v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:35 pm
By contrast, Texas Supreme Court Justice Don Willett’s concurring opinion today (joined by two other Justices) in Patel v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 12:33 pm
Co. (1st Dept., decided 12/15/2009) Since February 2008, when the New York Court of Appeals issued its groundbreaking, 5-2 decisions in Bi-Economy Mkt., Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 9:09 am
Nelson included a fascinating exchange between Justice Scalia (joined by Justice Thomas) and Justice Alito (writing for the rest of the Court except for Justice Kagan, who was recused). [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 11:16 am
Div. 1st Dept. 2001). [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 10:00 pm
Plaintiffs may prefer a different remedy, but they plainly have access to a judicial forum.id. at page 43 This critical interpretation of the CDC Order is from its legal counsel, the US Dept. of Justice, in a brief in filed in the Brown v. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 10:00 pm
Plaintiffs may prefer a different remedy, but they plainly have access to a judicial forum.id. at page 43 This critical interpretation of the CDC Order is from its legal counsel, the US Dept. of Justice, in a brief in filed in the Brown v. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 4:59 am
In Tzolis v. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 7:21 am
These provisions create a program designed to promote parenting skills for pregnant women and people who care for young children, and allow the use of federal funds to certain entities as long as they aren’t associated with any abortion activities. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 10:33 am
Alito concluded his opinion: “In Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. [read post]
