Search for: "Lord v. District of Columbia"
Results 21 - 40
of 73
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Oct 2020, 4:37 pm
All Lines of Insurance D.C.: On October 20, the District of Columbia Department of Insurance, Securities, and Banking (DISB) issued a notice informing insurers of the extension of the District’s Public Health Emergency through December 31, 2020. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
If we could put the whole American body politic behind such a veil and ask them to create a new mechanism for the selection of a president, would they not be driven to adopt the mode of election that most readers of this symposium likely prefer: a national popular vote, to be conducted in a single constituency (let’s call it the collective United States of America, as opposed to fifty electorally autonomous states and the District of Columbia), with a requirement that the… [read post]
22 Mar 2020, 5:12 pm
Structural Surveillance, Iowa Law Review, Forthcoming, Andrew Guthrie Ferguson, American University Washington College of Law; University of the District of Columbia – David A. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 5:06 am
To limit the burden on agency officials and prevent forum shopping, the statute might further provide that any qui tam action must be filed in federal district court in the District of Columbia. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 11:08 am
The hearing will feature testimony from Ellen Lord, the undersecretary of defense for acquisition and sustainment; Robert Behler, the director of operational test and evaluation in the office of the secretary of defense; Lt. [read post]
27 Oct 2019, 5:08 pm
Research and Resources Facial Recognition and the Fourth Amendment, Andrew Guthrie Ferguson, University of the District of Columbia – David A. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 9:53 am
Minersville School District, 24 F. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 1:49 pm
In Groat v. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 2:03 pm
John Reed Stark As cybersecurity has become an increasingly important consideration for all corporate operations, one of the most pernicious problems has been the rise of so-called “ransomware” attacks – that is, systems breaches in which hackers take control of corporate networks and demand ransom payments as a condition of unlocking the systems. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 4:28 pm
Canada In the case of Wilson v Canwest Publising 2018 BCCA 441 the Court of Appeal of British Columbia overturned an award of Can$125,000 damages made by the trial judge holding that the defence of responsible communication should be applied to the article as a whole. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 11:28 pm
Federal District Court Judge for the District of Columbia [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 5:00 am
On Dec. 11, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia heard arguments in ACLU v. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 8:51 am
On November 2, Sotomayor spoke at a National Association of Women Judges (District 4) ceremony honoring District of Columbia Court of Appeals Chief Judge Anna Blackburne-Rigsby with the Edna G. [read post]
10 May 2017, 8:01 am
Faced with the male Justices’ insensitivities during oral argument in Safford Unified School District v. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 9:44 am
District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 11:42 am
I've got "bear" in mind today, because I'm teaching District of Columbia v. [read post]
14 Aug 2016, 1:00 pm
[We’re pleased to have another outstanding guest post by Stephen Carlisle, an entertainment lawyer with over 25 years experience in private practice in the State of Florida. [read post]
26 May 2016, 6:00 am
Legislation is being considered in 27 states and the District of Columbia. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 7:37 am
Indeed, the practice of obtaining and executing Anton Piller orders was subject to a critical review by Mr Justice Scott in Columbia Picture Industries v Robinson [1986] (and see also the article "Piller problems"(1990) 106 LQR 601 by Professor Dockray and, as he then was, Hugh Laddie QC). [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
The first edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence [Manual] was published in 1994, a year after the Supreme Court delivered its opinion in Daubert. [read post]
