Search for: "Lorillard" Results 21 - 40 of 206
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Aug 2016, 9:21 am by Jennifer R. Scullion
Lorillard Tobacco Co., Inc., 94 N.Y.2d 43, 56 (1999) (consumers who buy a product that they would not have purchased absent deceptive conduct, without more, have not suffered injury)). [read post]
17 Jul 2016, 10:00 pm
‚¬); In re Lorillard Licensing Co., 99 USPQ2d 1312, 1316 (TTAB 2011). [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 6:46 am by Joe Consumer
Tisch — the Giants and Lorillard part owner — asked the cigarette company’s general counsel, Arthur J. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 5:49 am by Adam Doerr
Last month, we previewed the challenge to a settlement of litigation involving the Reynolds-Lorillard merger. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 2:12 pm by David Wright
James Snyder, the former General Counsel for Family Dollar, submitted an objection to a proposed disclosure-only settlement in the Reynolds-Lorillard merger litigation. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 6:09 am by Law Offices of Robert Dixon
., Lorillard Tobacco Co., and Liggett Group, faced a number of claims, including negligence, strict liability, fraudulent concealment, and conspiracy to commit fraud. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 5:00 am
Lorillard Tobacco Co., 377 F.3d 917, 925 (8th Cir. 2004) (applying Minnesota law); Wilson v. [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 10:44 am by Schachtman
No. 11-440 (RJL), 2012 WL 3542228 (Aug. 1, 2012). [8] Lorillard, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 7:54 am by Robert Kraft
Reynolds Tobacco, Lorillard, and Philip Morris USA to be required to identify themselves on health warning labels on cigarette packs and asked the U.S. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 8:38 am by Hardee Bass
Reynolds Tobacco Company – is obviously in a celebratory mood given her stewardship over Reynolds’ recent $25 billion acquisition of fellow cigarette-maker Lorillard Inc. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 8:09 am by Joe Consumer
., Philip Morris USA Inc. and Lorillard Tobacco Co. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 3:42 am by Peter Mahler
” For the meaning of the operative term, misappropriation, the court turned to the dictionary, quoting from Lorillard Tobacco Co. v American Legacy Foundation, 903 A2d 728, 738 [Del 2006], for the proposition that “‘[u]nder well-settled case law, Delaware courts look to dictionaries for assistance in determining the plain meaning of terms which are not defined in a contract. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
We’ve made no secret of our distaste for the so called “heeding presumption” – that juries may presume that any alternative “adequate” warning would have been heeded by the plaintiff (or, in prescription medical product cases, the prescriber). [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 5:30 am by Jane Bambauer
Notwithstanding the Supreme Court’s findings in Lorillard, empirical evidence is mixed on whether tobacco advertising mostly affects market share among brands or if it raises overall demand for tobacco products. [read post]