Search for: "Lowe v. Ford Motor Co."
Results 21 - 40
of 50
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Aug 2019, 7:00 am
In that case, the Dodge brothers, founders of Dodge Motors, and stockholders of Ford Motor Co., sued Ford Motor Co. alleging that Henry Ford’s decision to reinvest the company’s profits to cut the price of the Model T Ford and raise the wages of his workers was an incorrect decision. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 3:56 am
Likewise, five African-American employees were allowed to proceed on their retaliation and hostile environment claims based, in part, on an allegation that, after a coworker filed an EEOC charge on behalf of herself and a “class of Black employees,” they were given excessive workloads as compared to non-African-American workers (Rogers v Ford Motor Co). [read post]
25 May 2009, 3:34 pm
Co., 2009 WL 1383750 (Pa.Super. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 10:09 am
Ford Motor Co. (2011) 199 Cal.App.4th 1475 (offer of $10,000 plus costs in mesothelioma case upheld as reasonable and shifted six figures in expert witness fees). [read post]
2 May 2014, 2:59 pm
Ford Motor Co., US 6th Cir. (4/22/14)Labor & Employment LawIn 2003 Harris was hired as a resale buyer at Ford. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 5:05 pm
” The auto alliance includes General Motors Co., Ford Motor Co., Chrysler Group LLC, Toyota and eight others. [read post]
10 May 2020, 7:40 pm
Ford Motor Co. established this principle when defendant Henry Ford progressively lowered the prices of his cars and withheld dividends from stockholders when he learned of the Dodge brothers’ plan to cash out their shares in Ford Motor and start their own car company. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 11:28 am
Ford Motor Co. established this principle when defendant Henry Ford progressively lowered the prices of his cars and withheld dividends from stockholders when he learned of the Dodge brothers’ plan to cash out their shares in Ford Motor and start their own car company. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 5:00 am
Ohio 2009) warranty; privityIn re Ford Motor Co. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 4:19 pm
Ford Motor Credit Company, Appellee. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 2:06 am
General Motors Corp., 20 Cal.3d 725, 739 (1978). [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 2:09 pm
CPSC 2008 Performance and Accountability Report, November 2008) Meanwhile, traffic fatalities in the United States have fallen to record lows. [read post]
11 May 2019, 11:47 am
In Godoy v. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 12:57 am
See In re Ford Motor Co., 345 F.3d 1315 (11th Cir. 2003); Comment to 1970 Amendment of Fed R. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 2:54 am
It claims that Ford and General Motors are in breach of the 1992 Audio Home Recording Act by placing hard drives in their cars that, amongst other things, allow users to rip music onto the disk for in-car enjoyment, without paying a levy to the AARC under the provisions of the Audio Home Recording Act - although the 1999 case between the RIAA and Diamond Multimedia Sy [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 6:48 pm
Then 1973 rolled around and all of a sudden General Motors, Ford, Chrysler and American Motors… the Big 4, if you can remember that far back… all seemed terribly out of step with what was going on in the world. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 6:43 am
Leinweber Co., Inc., Driv-Lok, Inc., Ford Motor Co., and ExxonMobil Oil Corp. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am
Searle & Co., 630 F. [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
Upjohn Co., 778 A.2d 829, 846 (Conn. 2001); Niemiera v. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
By adopting a more nuanced analysis, the Second Edition deprived defense counsel of a readily citable source for the proposition that low relative risks do not support inferences of specific causation. [read post]
