Search for: "Lujan v. United States"
Results 21 - 40
of 148
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2012, 5:13 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 9:17 am
This is also not a case like Lujan v. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 6:57 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2007, 3:24 am
III, § 2; Lujan v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 4:37 am
Lujan In the case that was discovered (United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 11:54 am
Byrd, 521 U.S. 811 (1997); Lujan v. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 8:28 am
United States, 521 U.S. 898 (1997) Lujan v. [read post]
10 Sep 2021, 10:18 pm
See Lujan v. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 11:45 am
EPA "recalls the previous high-water mark of diluted standing requirements, United States v. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 6:00 am
United States Parole Commission v. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 3:39 pm
” (To support the nationwide injunction, Washington argued that immigration law had to be uniform; ironically, the state had opposed this exact argument in United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 1:16 am
§ 437g(a)(8)(A), which states that "Any party aggrieved by an order of the Commission dismissing a complaint filed by such party ... may file a petition with the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 11:29 am
A kind reader has informed us that the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, in a precedential ruling, has affirmed the dismissal of the birther suit in Kerchner v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 6:01 pm
Boyle, United States Magistrate Judge. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 9:52 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 7:05 pm
Significantly, the Court was careful to note that pleading the requisite degree of “injury” for purposes of Prop 64 standing is not onerous:We also relied on the United States Supreme Court's description of "injury in fact" for federal court standing purposes as " 'an invasion of a legally protected interest which is (a) concrete and particularized . . . and (b) "actual or imminent, not 'conjectural' or 'hypothetical,'… [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 1:00 am
” See Lujan v. [read post]
15 Sep 2021, 2:00 am
” See Lujan v. [read post]
14 Dec 2021, 1:00 am
” See Lujan v. [read post]
