Search for: "MALHOTRA v. MALHOTRA"
Results 21 - 38
of 38
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2011, 11:49 am
§ Identify and Leverage Your Distinct Value Proposition [V]ery often, you do bring something to the table that distinguishes you from your competitors. [read post]
26 Apr 2020, 4:25 pm
On the same day Nicklin J handed down the judgment in Riley v Murray [2020] EWHC 997 (QB). [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 10:03 am
This Court, in the case of Madhu Sudan Malhotra v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 10:18 pm
Next it was Aparajita’s turn to come up with an incisive case review of Lupin Ltd. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 11:00 am
M/s Harbans Lal Malhotra & Sons Pvt. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 3:00 am
LLC v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 12:00 pm
Vacic V, McCarthy S, Malhotra D, Murray F, Chou H-H, Peoples A, Makarov V, Yoon S, Bhandari A, Corominas R, Iakoucheva LM, Krastoshevsky O, Krause V, Larach-Walters V, Welsh DK, Craig D, Kelsoe JR, Gershon ES, Leal SM, Aquila M, Morris DW, Gill M, Corvin A, Insel PA, McClellan J, King M-C, Karayiorgou M,Levy DL, DeLisi LE, Sebat J. [read post]
25 May 2009, 11:02 am
In TN Kalyana Mandapam v. [read post]
19 Aug 2007, 11:42 am
[V]ery often, you do bring something to table that distinguishes you from your competitors [i.e., other Law Review EOC's from Ivy League law schools]. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 1:38 am
P SathasivamSupreme Court of IndiaThe Supreme Court in Anita Malhotra Vs. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 9:23 am
Pranesh further criticized the decision of Justice Manmohan Singh of the Delhi High Court in John Wiley v. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 4:25 pm
On 21 December 2011, Eady J gave judgment in the “harassment” case of Neocleous v Jones ([2011] EWHC 3459 (QB)) Two judgments were also given in relation to “phone hacking indemnity” claims, Coulson v NGN ([2011] EWHC 3482 (QB)) and Mulcaire v NGN ([2011] EWHC 3469 (Ch)). [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 7:32 am
This is “differentiation v integration”. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 5:01 am
It also presented the publishers’ view, which is apparently, dubbing the course-pack system as commercial exploitation and piracy instead of educational fair use, all in the name of protecting the rights of the content creators and publishers, as was voiced by Sudhir Malhotra, president of the Federation of Indian Publishers (FIP). [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 5:55 pm
Working Papers, CDDRL Stanford http://iis-db.stanford.edu/pubs/22693/No_103_Sarma_India_Arbitration_India_509.pdf[ii] Malhotra, O.P and Indu, The Law and Practice of Arbitration and Conciliation, Lexis Nexis, 2nd Edn. at page 63 [iii]Discussing the intent behind introducing Section 89 in the Code, the Supreme Court in Salem Advocate Bar Association v. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 2:57 am
On 1 November 2022, there was a trial of preliminary issues in the case of Blake v Fox. [read post]
28 Sep 2012, 12:04 am
Joshi and others v. [read post]
4 May 2011, 11:12 am
The Supreme Court in Surya Devi Rai v. [read post]
