Search for: "MATTER OF ADOPTION OF MORRISON" Results 21 - 40 of 268
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Aug 2012, 1:27 am by Kevin LaCroix
What matter is whether the relevant facts were disclosed and were clearly available to plaintiffs. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 12:41 pm by Larry Ribstein
The Supreme Court, per Scalia, opined yesterday in Morrison v. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
The Amended Regulation raises the benchmark for cybersecurity regulations and provides a model for other regulators to adopt. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 6:41 am
"(Link to full story and interview at AARP site ("Newsmaker: Toni Morrison," by Marilyn Milloy, January & February 2009 AARP Magazine: "The Nobel laureate imagines a world where race doesn't matter") [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 12:20 am by Kevin LaCroix
  A December 6, 2013 memo from the Morrison & Foerster firm describing the Act can be found here. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
However, legal challenges could force agencies to adopt a more restrained approach. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 5:01 am by Brandon Kirk Williams
During the pandemic, China has worked to further entrench its control over the South China Sea—a matter of great concern to Australia. [read post]
8 May 2013, 11:30 am by Alan Morrison
Morrison is the Lerner Family Associate Dean for Public Interest & Public Service Law George Washington University Law School. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 5:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
    Morrison was a loss of sorts, with the Court staking out a hostility to extraterritorial application of the antifraud provisions. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 1:32 pm by Eduardo Ustaran
Since day one, the ICO has adopted a broad interpretation of what amounts to direct marketing. [read post]
13 May 2011, 8:57 am by Kurt Lash
  The Court could adopt one without adopting the other. [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 5:45 am
"North Carolina's death penalty has been on hold since January, when thestate Medical Board adopted a policy that threatened disciplinary actionagainst any physician who participated in an execution.A judge ruled that the policy conflicted with state law requiring thepresence of a physician at executions, and he said the Council of Statewould have to resolve the matter. [read post]