Search for: "MATTER OF D R B"
Results 21 - 40
of 5,959
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jan 2016, 4:54 pm
D calls W who testifies that D was with W and others at a card game when the robbery took place. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 9:30 pm
R. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 4:54 pm
D calls W who testifies that D was with W and others at a card game when the robbery took place. [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 11:04 am
Table of Contents Key Findings Introduction Evaluating the Federal R&D ax Credit Effectiveness of the R&D Tax Credit — Does the R&D Credit Increase R&D Spending? [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 5:01 pm
As a matter of fact, under R 106, a petition under A 112a(2)(c) is only admissible where an objection in respect of the procedural defect was raised during the appeal proceedings and dismissed by the BoA, except where such objection could not be raised during the appeal proceedings. [read post]
7 Jan 2022, 4:00 am
CZS Holdings LLC d/b/a Pur360, No. 20 C 6886, Slip Op. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 12:59 pm
R. [read post]
13 May 2022, 8:59 am
This case is about the nature and extent of those constraints in securities fraud cases in which the SEC seeks penalties.The SEC OIPOn March 22, 2014, the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") filed an Order Instituting Administrative Proceedings ("OIP") In the Matter of John Thomas Capital Management Group LLC, D/B/A Patriot28 LLC, George R. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 10:16 am
Well, in a reference about Article 3(d), it is really all about Article 1(b). [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 1:42 pm
Rule 506 (c) forbids such investment outright, but another Regulation D rule, Rule 506(b), allows non-accredited investment as long as the investors are "sophisticated" and the start-up raising the money has no more than 35 of them investing in the offering.Sophisticated Investor: A sophisticated investor is a non-accredited investor that has superior knowledge of business and financial matters. [read post]
7 May 2013, 5:01 pm
Normally I do not present decisions of the Disciplinary Board, but I found this one quite entertaining.The appeal was filed by a candidate who had failed the EQE 2009 after having been awarded the following marks: A: 49; B: 55; C: 39; D: 57.*** Translation of the German original ***[2.1] The appellant pointed out that the (fictitious) client’s letter on which paper A was based clearly and unambiguously indicated that the client did not desire to obtain patent protection for… [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 1:30 am
Yadav, Nicole B. [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 9:51 am
This posting covers Links on the LawPundit Main Page : (2) (b) The Law Blogroll - B:Bag and Baggage by Denise M. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 5:00 am
R. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 5:00 am
R. [read post]
18 Sep 2010, 11:01 am
R 104 is the implementing rule providing two additional fundamental procedural defects to wit, (a) the Board did not hold OPs despite a request to this end; or (b) it omitted to decide upon a request. [read post]
26 May 2015, 3:23 pm
[Tina D.] v. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 1:00 am
In D 11/18, a 2018 EQE candidate successfully appealed the decision of the Examination Board to fail his Paper B script (D 11/18). [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 9:58 am
In the matter of Diane R. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 2:02 pm
" Jervis B. [read post]
