Search for: "MATTER OF RULES FOR ADMISSION TO TH" Results 21 - 40 of 63
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2020, 8:36 am by Marty Lederman
Gore,you would have expected the lower court to be able to rule on the motion. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 11:00 pm by Roel van Woudenberg
In the decision under appeal, the opposition division came to the conclusion that:- the subject-matter of claim 1 of the main request, the first auxiliary request as well as the fourth auxiliary request did not meet the requirements of Article 123(2) EPC;- the subject-matter of claim 1 of the second auxiliary request did not meet the requirements of Article 54 EPC; and- the third auxiliary request was not to be admitted into the opposition proceedings.III. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 9:30 am by Josh Blackman
” Further, as a matter of inherent Article II authority, even in the absence of any statute, the President could deny entry to the United States of those he deems dangerous. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 5:56 am
The Government also contends that the Law School Evidence may be admissible for purposes of impeachment under Rule 608(b) of the Federal Rules of Evidence. . . . [read post]
28 Jan 2012, 9:40 am by Ed Wallis
Robinson, Sr., & Jeff Mobley, Pritchard on the Law of Wills and the Administration of Estates § 124, at 203 (5 ed. th 1994). [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm by Mary Dwyer
Douglas 13-191Issue: Whether the Due Process Clause is violated by the Florida Supreme Court’s new rule of preclusion, which permits Engle v. [read post]
2 Sep 2023, 3:29 pm by Russell Knight
Evid. 801 “Hearsay is not admissible except as provided by these rules, by other rules prescribed by the Supreme Court, or by statute as provided in Rule 101. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 5:31 am by Naman Karl-Thomas Habtom
Her party, the Social Democrats, has historically been the party of nonalignment—with government ministers ruling out NATO membership as recently as the autumn of 2021. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 3:25 am
  The 2nd assignment of error in th 4th District’s case of State v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 11:43 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
And, of the testimony:The district court excluded Thomas’s testimony re- garding his prior use of the claimed invention as uncor- roborated in light of the “general rule” that “corroboration of oral testimony regarding prior invention or use is required before the evidence is admissible. [read post]
20 Oct 2019, 1:27 pm by Giles Peaker
The issue is, in part, what rules on new evidence apply to Upper Tribunal appeals on civil penalties. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Moeser’s organization for not providing enough details about its internal test-validation processes and doubted whether the rest of the world can “have confidence in th[e] self-serving unaudited assertion” that the test was not flawed. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 4:05 am by Léon Dijkman
Notwithstanding the admission of fresh evidence on this issue, the Court of Appeal reached the same conclusion. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 11:52 am
Williams, No. 06-3620 Conviction for armed robbery and possession of a firearm during a crime of violence is affirmed where the district judge did not err in ruling that the testimony of eyewitnesses would be admissible at trial since a lineup in which the eyewitnesses identified the defendant was not flawed in any way that would lead to irreparable misidentification. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 6:11 am by Ashley Gorski
Although surveillance plaintiffs may meet the plausibility threshold at the outset of a case, plaintiffs are eventually required to prove their standing with admissible evidence. [read post]