Search for: "MATTER OF RULES OF EVIDENCE"
Results 21 - 40
of 41,883
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2011, 7:16 am
This frequently occurs already, either by way of institutional rules or simply as a matter of practice. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 3:00 am
–JR The post A Controversy No Matter How Local, Must Be Established With Evidence appeared first on CAFA Law Blog. [read post]
7 Sep 2009, 8:05 am
Like its federal counterpart, Tennessee Rule of Evidence 602 provides in relevant part that "[a] witness may not testify to a matter unless evidence is introduced sufficient to support a finding that the witness has personal knowledge of the matter. [read post]
20 Sep 2008, 12:46 am
PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE* Rule 502. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 4:46 am
Federal Rule of Evidence 404(a)(1) provides that Evidence of a person’s character or character trait is not admissible to prove that on a particular occasion the person acted in accordance with the character or trait. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 3:42 pm
Rule 502 does address a number of matters related to privilege. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 6:24 am
Further, the Florida courts have ruled that evidence that bears no connection to the defendant or to the alleged crime is too prejudicial to be admissible. [read post]
14 Mar 2021, 6:50 am
The post Court Explains Admissibility of Evidence of Other Acts in Michigan Criminal Matters appeared first on Ann Arbor Criminal Defense Blog. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 6:00 am
But the rules of evidence do some other things too. [read post]
14 May 2022, 8:25 pm
Although jurors decide on such matters of fact as credibilty of witnesses, judges decide all matters of law, including ruling on defense motions to suppress / exclude evidence from an allegedly unlawful traffic stop, search or arrest, and from allegedly unlawful questioning of the criminal defendant; and ruling on the admissiblity of evidence, including certificates of analysis of breath and blood testing for alcohol concentration. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 6:11 am
Federal Rule of Evidence 611(b) states that Cross-examination should not go beyond the subject matter of the direct examination and matters affecting the witness’s credibility. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 5:09 pm
There is no intent to change any result in any ruling on evidence admissibility. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 9:36 am
With the exception of a few evidence scholars, Federal Rule of Evidence 703 is ignored or misunderstood in practice. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 8:37 am
That exception allows a record to be read into evidence if, to put it simply, the witness no longer remembers the matters reflected in the record. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 8:37 am
That exception allows a record to be read into evidence if, to put it simply, the witness no longer remembers the matters reflected in the record. [read post]
16 May 2011, 11:15 am
Rule 413(a) of the Federal Rules of Evidence provides:In a criminal case in which the defendant is accused of an offense of sexual assault, evidence of the defendant's commission of another offense or offenses of sexual assault is admissible, and may be considered for its bearing on any matter to which it is relevant.However, Dominique Strauss-Kahn, head of the IMF and leading candidate for President of France, is not charged with sexual assault… [read post]
20 Jul 2014, 1:21 pm
New Military Rules of Evidence publication The Military Rules of Evidence (MRE) are published by the President in the Manual for Courts-Martial (MCM). [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 8:20 am
Some of the reasons why relevant evidence may be excluded are that the evidence is based on hearsay testimony, the evidence has not been properly authenticated, or the evidence relates to a privileged matter. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 7:30 pm
Federal Rule of Evidence 412(a), the federal Rape Shield Rule, provides that evidence of an alleged victim's sexual predisposition or other sexual behavior is inadmissible to establish her propensity to consent to sexual acts and her conformity with that propensity,... [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 6:09 am
For the London Free Press - April 25, 2011 Read this on Canoe There is a common-law rule that illegally obtained evidence is admissible in court no matter how it was obtained. [read post]
