Search for: "MATTER OF SHAW"
Results 21 - 40
of 1,229
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2016, 3:12 pm
” Shaw raised its Payne-based ground in itspetition for IPR. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 4:00 am
ACS challenged the Board’s decision that Shaw was not barred from bringing the second IPR because the petition was filed more than one year after a complaint for infringement was served on Shaw. [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 6:30 pm
As a matter of policy, we do not comment on these matters. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 8:35 am
Meet Mia Shaw How long have you been at KNC? [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 8:35 am
Meet Mia Shaw How long have you been at KNC? [read post]
28 May 2024, 7:30 am
Reed Shaw is a Policy Counsel at Governing for Impact. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 10:54 am
Forthcoming from Routledge:Julia Shaw, Law and the Passions: A Discrete History (2017). [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 8:31 pm
The Court of Appeals said that the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to hear the case. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 6:30 am
Katherine Shaw, Yeshiva University-Benjamin N. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 10:00 pm
Following two significant holdings for defendants in False Claims Act (FCA) matters predicated on the Anti-Kickback Statute (AKS), associate Nina Shaw and partners Eric Sitarchuk, Alison Tanchyk, Jaclyn Unis Whittaker, and William McEnroe write in Law360 that a “seismic shift” has occurred in FCA kickback causation. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 10:00 pm
Following two significant holdings for defendants in False Claims Act (FCA) matters predicated on the Anti-Kickback Statute (AKS), associate Nina Shaw and partners Eric Sitarchuk, Alison Tanchyk, Jaclyn Unis Whittaker, and William McEnroe write in Law360 that a “seismic shift” has occurred in FCA kickback causation. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 10:00 pm
Following two significant holdings for defendants in False Claims Act (FCA) matters predicated on the Anti-Kickback Statute (AKS), associate Nina Shaw and partners Eric Sitarchuk, Alison Tanchyk, Jaclyn Unis Whittaker, and William McEnroe write in Law360 that a “seismic shift” has occurred in FCA kickback causation. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 10:00 pm
Following two significant holdings for defendants in False Claims Act (FCA) matters predicated on the Anti-Kickback Statute (AKS), associate Nina Shaw and partners Eric Sitarchuk, Alison Tanchyk, Jaclyn Unis Whittaker, and William McEnroe write in Law360 that a “seismic shift” has occurred in FCA kickback causation. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 10:00 pm
Following two significant holdings for defendants in False Claims Act (FCA) matters predicated on the Anti-Kickback Statute (AKS), associate Nina Shaw and partners Eric Sitarchuk, Alison Tanchyk, Jaclyn Unis Whittaker, and William McEnroe write in Law360 that a “seismic shift” has occurred in FCA kickback causation. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 10:00 pm
Following two significant holdings for defendants in False Claims Act (FCA) matters predicated on the Anti-Kickback Statute (AKS), associate Nina Shaw and partners Eric Sitarchuk, Alison Tanchyk, Jaclyn Unis Whittaker, and William McEnroe write in Law360 that a “seismic shift” has occurred in FCA kickback causation. [read post]
25 Sep 2010, 1:03 am
Shaw for two years, with the second year of that term stayed on conditions, for professional misconduct in his handling of legal matters entrusted to him by two sets of clients and for failing to promptly cooperate with disciplinary authorities investigating the grievances filed against him. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 8:10 am
The court found that Shawe and Elting are deadlocked on several matters of critical importance to TPG but noted that the issue of harm is a closer question because the company has been highly profitable. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 6:24 am
At the Shaw Group, P.C., we recognize that a divorce or family law matter is one of the most difficult life challenges that you may face. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 11:03 am
It also did not matter, the court ruled, that Shaw did not intend the bank to lose money. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 7:50 am
Nor does it matter that Shaw had no purpose to defraud the bank, since the statute requires only that he had knowledge of the fraudulent scheme, which he clearly had. [read post]