Search for: "MATTER OF T A AND T R A"
Results 21 - 40
of 53,754
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Aug 2011, 3:01 pm
As a matter of fact, this provision has undergone some change when the EPC 2000 entered into force. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 5:01 pm
R 137(4) in the version that was in force from December 13, 2007, to March 31, 2010 (hereinafter referred to as R 137(4), version of before April 1, 2010) has to be applied.[2.2.2] R 137(4), version of before April 1, 2010, provides that amended claims may not relate to unsearched subject-matter which does not combine with the originally claimed invention or group of inventions to form a single general inventive concept. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 5:01 pm
It therefore provides the means to stop applicants, in reply to the first communication, dropping existing claims, replacing them by switching to unsearched and non-unitary subject-matter extracted from the description, i.e., claiming different subject-matter in sequence rather than simultaneously (T 274/03 [4], T 915/03 [3], T 1285/11 [2]). [read post]
24 Nov 2012, 11:01 am
T 283/88 [4]). [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 7:08 am
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Unpublished Opinion in the following matter: DA 12-0098, 2012 MT 188N, IN THE MATTER OF: T.R. 1 and T.R. 2, Youths in Need of Care. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 8:20 am
This could come in a matter of weeks. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 8:49 am
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Unpublished Opinion in the following matter: DA 12-0019, 2012 MT 148N, IN THE MATTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP OF : R.T., A Minor. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 12:44 pm
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Unpublished Opinion in the following matter: DA 10-0636, 2011 MT 164, IN THE MATTER OF: R.M.T., A Youth in Need of Care. [read post]
28 Aug 2011, 5:01 pm
In this context, [opponent 2] made reference to R 43 and R 139. [read post]
22 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm
As a matter of fact, the fax shows that the page containing the notice of appeal in Italian was received at 18:26:21 whereas the Italian version was received at 18:26:37, i.e. 16 seconds later.The Board won’t have it:[1.2] The opponent (appellant 1) considered that the requirements of R 6(3) concerning the reduction of the appeal fee were not met, that the paid amount was not correct and that therefore, the appeal lodged by the patentee was to be rejected as… [read post]
9 May 2013, 5:01 pm
In point (3)(a) of the order it is stated that “Such oral submissions cannot be made as a matter of right, but only with the permission of and under the discretion of the EPO. [read post]
9 May 2013, 5:01 pm
In point (3)(a) of the order it is stated that “Such oral submissions cannot be made as a matter of right, but only with the permission of and under the discretion of the EPO. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 9:00 am
In the Matter of Felton R. v Gloria P., Felton R. no longer wanted to be held to his paternal responsibilities. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm
Moreover, as a matter of principle, it lies in a party’s responsibility to file its requests in an unambiguous manner. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm
J 10/07, T 1366/04, T 1279/05). [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 5:26 am
Just will present a lecture, "Food, Policy and Behavioral Economics: Why Choice Matters and Why it Doesn’t," 6:00 pm Monday, September 29, 2014, at the the University Club of Michigan State University.David R. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 5:01 pm
If any reader can shed some light on this matter, please do so.To download the whole decision, click here.The file wrapper can be found here. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 4:01 pm
It is also the applicant who receives the EPO communications regarding the European patent application (see for example R 55, 56(1), first sentence, and (2), second sentence, R 58, R 60, R 65, R 69(1), R 70(2) and A 94(3) together with R 71). [9] The provisions of the EPC foresee a few exceptional situations where, apart from the applicant, a person other than the applicant (so-called “third party”) is involved as a party in… [read post]
15 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm
A process for removing nitrogen oxides from flue gas issuing from a regenerator of a fluidized catalytic cracking unit wherein the flue gas is cleaned of substantial amounts of dust in the regenerator, the process comprising the steps of:a) directing the flue gas into a tertiary cyclone separator and separating the solids therefrom so that not more than 250mg/Nm3 of solids exit in an overflow from the tertiary cyclone separator and causing between 0.5% and 6% percentage of flue gas entering the… [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 3:01 pm
The Board then stated:[4] In summary, the board finds that claim 1 of both requests relates to the technical implementation of excluded matter in the form of game rules. [read post]
