Search for: "MATTER OF T J H" Results 21 - 40 of 1,351
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jan 2016, 1:18 pm
 The peace didn't last long, as two years later Stretchline issued new proceedings alleging that H&M had infringed its patent in breach of the 2011 settlement agreement. [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 6:04 am
Clifford's local counsel, Atlanta solo practitioner Deanna H. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 2:50 pm by Mary
DEADLINE to submit comments (informal, individuals, associations, formal, any) is MAY 2 DRAFT N J L A L E T T E R H E A D Federal Trade Commission Office of the Secretary, Room H-113 (Annex D) 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20580 Re: Google Buzz, File No.1023136 To the FTC: The New Jersey Library Association submits this comment on the proposed consent order, In the Matter of Google Inc., File No. 1023136, between the FTC and… [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 9:27 am by Raymond Wee Hock Tan
How times have changed. yīnwèi wǒde  pǔ tōnɡ huà bù jíɡé, Wǒde fēn shù bú ɡòu shànɡ zhongxué,suǒ yǐ,chú le ɡōnɡ zuò hé zài yèxiào xuéxí wǒ miéyǒu biéde xuǎn zé。Na ge shi hou,pǔ tōnɡ… [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 1:34 pm by Schachtman
Ghio, Maryann Bassett, Tracey Montilla, Eugene H. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 2:21 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
This matters because a form 1099 will only report the name and Social Security Number (SSN) of one taxpayer: There isn’t room for a second (or third) taxpayer’s information. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 8:26 pm by Ted Folkman
H/T to Chris Bray for noting the unusual exchange of letters in the Belfast Project case. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 7:19 am by Guest Author
These days, this isn’t a claim about any particular Congress, but an assertion about Congresses in general—they don’t leave the big stuff to federal agencies in ambiguous, capacious, or obscure delegations. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
A statement was provided by Mr H. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 4:22 pm
(h/t to Milton Finch for correcting the Bishop's misspelling of Mr. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 11:56 am by S & F Media LLC.
This means that either party may file for a divorce without proving any grounds other than the spouses don't want to be married anymore. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Citing the decision in Matter of Marsteller, 217 AD3d 543, the Appellate Division said "(t)he affirmation of Eric J. [read post]