Search for: "MCDONALD POLICE v. Geneva"
Results 21 - 32
of 32
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2016, 4:00 am
Significantly, said the Appellate Division, as the petitioners are now retireed, the School District does not have a statutory duty to bargain with them within the meaning of the Taylor Law, citing Aeneas McDonald Police Benevolent Assn. v City of Geneva, 92 NY2d 326. [read post]
8 May 2016, 4:15 pm
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia In the case of Dods v McDonald (No.2) [2016] VSC 201, Bell J awarded damages of Aus$150,000 to a police officer against a barrister who are jury had found had defamed him in online comments. [read post]
2 Nov 2014, 4:06 pm
Some years ago, the Greater Manchester Police applied for an injunction to restrain the broadcast of a Donal McIntyre programme. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 4:00 am
Further, said the court, pursuant to this duty to negotiate, where a past practice between a public employer and its current employees is established involving a mandatory subject of negotiation, the Taylor Law bars the employer from discontinuing that practice without prior negotiation, citing Aeneas McDonald Police Benevolent Assn. v City of Geneva, 92 NY2d 326. [read post]
14 May 2012, 3:35 am
Thus, noted the Appellate Division, as the Court of Appeals has held, and PERB rationally concluded, here that Chenango Forks "ha[d] a duty to negotiate with the bargaining representative of current employees regarding any change in a past practice affecting their own retirement health benefits," citing Matter of Aeneas McDonald Police Benevolent Assn. v City of Geneva, 92 NY2d at 332 [emphasis omitted]; see Matter of Incorporated Vil. of Lynbrook… [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 3:42 am
Div., 252 AD2d 82, Motion for leave to appeal denied, 93 NY2d 1000[Decided with Andriano v City of Schenectady, motion for leave to appeal denied, 93 NY2d 999]In McDonald Police Benevolent Association v City of Geneva, 92 NY2d 326, the Court of Appeals ruled that there was no legal impediment to the City of Geneva’s unilateral alteration of “a past practice ... unrelated to any entitlement expressly conferred upon retirees in a… [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 3:56 am
Retiree health insurance benefitsAeneas McDonald PBA v City of Geneva, App. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 3:37 am
”The Aeneas McDonald Police Benevolent Association, Inc. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 3:17 am
”The Circuit Court said “This language cannot be reasonably interpreted to explicitly state that benefits vested as soon as a worker became eligible for a pension or to retire” as the phrase “shall be provided” in the Plan refers to “retired employees,” rather than to current employees who might retire in the future.There have been a number of cases addressing the continuation of health insurance coverage upon retirement decided by New York courts.In… [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 4:00 am
"The Circuit Court said "This language cannot be reasonably interpreted to explicitly state that benefits vested as soon as a worker became eligible for a pension or to retire" as the phrase "shall be provided" in the Plan refers to "retired employees," rather than to current employees who might retire in the future.There have been a number of cases addressing the continuation of health insurance coverage upon retirement decided by New York courts.In… [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 4:18 am
In McDonald PBA v City of Geneva, 92 N.Y.2d 326, the Court of Appeals concluded that "there is no legal impediment to the municipality's unilateral alteration of the past practice" regarding its providing health insurance benefits to its retirees and their dependents where there was neither a Taylor Law agreement nor some other contract or provision of law granting retirees a vested right to such a benefit [emphasis supplied]. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 1:50 pm
Supreme Court, January 07, 2008 Arave v. [read post]
