Search for: "MCLAREN MACOMB"
Results 21 - 40
of 85
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2023, 2:00 am
The Board has now reversed these 2020 additions with its recent ruling of McLaren Macomb, a case relating to the structure and content of severance agreements and their enforceability under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA), stating its intention to return to a “plain language” determination. [read post]
8 May 2023, 8:23 am
For more information on the McLaren Macomb decision, please look to Epstein Becker Green’s previous blog post. [read post]
4 May 2023, 11:12 am
The McLaren Macomb case involved furloughed employees that were offered a severance agreement containing non-disparagement language that prohibited them from making negative statements about the employer. [read post]
3 May 2023, 12:41 pm
(The mention of former employees here is interesting given its recent decision in McLaren Macomb Hospital where the Board took issue with certain provisions in severance agreements that would have restricted former employees from engaging with the Board.) [read post]
2 May 2023, 10:02 am
The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) recently issued a decision in McLaren Macomb, 372 NLRB No. 58 (2023). [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 2:00 am
McLaren Macomb (Case 07-CA-263041). [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:00 pm
The Background: McLaren Macomb On February 21, 2023, the National Labor Relations Board (“the Board”) decided McLaren Macomb, a case where a hospital offered severance pay to eleven permanently furloughed employees in exchange for the employees agreeing to sign a severance agreement. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 6:24 am
The McLaren decision has sparked significant interest. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 2:00 am
What Happened in McLaren Macomb The employer operates a hospital with over 2,000 employees. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 10:43 am
On March 22, the National Labor Relations Board’s General Counsel (GC) issued a memorandum addressing many of the questions that employers were left asking themselves following the Board’s decision in McLaren Macomb, 372 NLRB No. 58 (2023). [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 1:25 pm
Last month we published an article on the NLRB’s decision in McLaren Macomb Hospital where the Board reversed course on the NLRB’s prior position on interpreting severance agreements under Section 7 of the NLRA. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 12:52 pm
McLaren Macomb applies retroactively subject to, as, the General Counsel acknowledged the six-month statute of limitations. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 12:31 pm
The Backdrop McLaren Macomb, a unionized teaching hospital in Michigan, laid off a portion of its staff during the pandemic. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 8:21 am
In McLaren Macomb, the NLRB held that it is unlawful to include broad non-disparagement and confidentiality provisions in severance agreements. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 6:19 am
NLRB General Counsel, Jennifer Abruzzo, issued a memorandum addressing the NLRB's decision in McLaren Macomb (memo | press release | McLaren decision). [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 5:52 am
The McLaren Macomb Decision In McLaren Macomb, an employer offered severance agreements to employees laid off during the COVID-19 pandemic. [read post]
26 Mar 2023, 6:08 am
Earlier this month, the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) issued its decision in McLaren Macomb, 372 NLRB No. 58 (2023), holding that not only are most non-disparagement and confidentiality clauses signed by employees covered by the National Labor Relations Act (“Act”) void as a matter of policy, but merely including one in a proposed severance agreement to an employee violates the Act. [read post]
26 Mar 2023, 6:08 am
Earlier this month, the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) issued its decision in McLaren Macomb, 372 NLRB No. 58 (2023), holding that not only are most non-disparagement and confidentiality clauses signed by employees covered by the National Labor Relations Act (“Act”) void as a matter of policy, but merely including one in a proposed severance agreement to an employee violates the Act. [read post]
26 Mar 2023, 6:08 am
Earlier this month, the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) issued its decision in McLaren Macomb, 372 NLRB No. 58 (2023), holding that not only are most non-disparagement and confidentiality clauses signed by employees covered by the National Labor Relations Act (“Act”) void as a matter of policy, but merely including one in a proposed severance agreement to an employee violates the Act. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 11:53 am
NLRB GC memorandum opines on scope of McLaren Macomb decision, in which the Board overturned two decisions that had permitted employers to include confidentiality and nondisparagement provisions in severance agreements. [read post]
