Search for: "MERCK & CO V US" Results 21 - 40 of 441
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Oct 2014, 3:42 pm by Jon Gelman
Today's post was shared by WCBlog and comes from whbl.com MADRID (Reuters) - Merck & Co's new immune system drug Keytruda has produced encouraging results in early tests against bladder cancer, according to a company-sponsored study, prompting the firm to prepare a clinical trial later this year.Keytruda is the first in a new wave of immune-boosting medicines to be approved for treating melanomas in the United States, but it also has potential in a range of… [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 2:44 pm
Just last week, Merck & Co. decided to settle tens of thousands of claims for $4.85 billion from patients who took the powerful painkiller Vioxx. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 6:37 pm by Dr. Shezad Malik
Merck & Co. lost the second trial to reach a verdict over claims its osteoporosis drug Fosamax causes so-called jaw death. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 2:09 pm
In No. 08-905, Merck & Co., Inc. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 9:14 am
  Please join me and my fellow co-host and Law.com blogger Bob Ambrogi, as we talk to the experts and take us inside the Vioxx settlement. [read post]
14 Jul 2018, 9:30 pm by Patent Docs
Watson Labs and The Medicines Co. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 3:06 pm by Harold O'Grady
In a victory for the plaintiff shareholders, the US Supreme Court unanimously ruled in Merck & Co., Inc. v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 7:03 am
  The Justices granted review of Merck &;amp; Co., et al., v. [read post]
3 Feb 2018, 8:58 pm by Patent Docs
Jorge Goldstein of Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox, PLLC; Brian Kacedon of Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP; and William Krovatin of Merck & Co Inc. will discuss strategies and recent court cases that involve: • Staking out the claim that a sale is not an "authorized sale" — Chrimar v. [read post]