Search for: "Manville Corp. v. United States" Results 21 - 40 of 42
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
June. 13, 2013), holding essentially that, since those meanies on the United States Supreme Court aren’t letting plaintiffs sue generic manufacturers, we’ll change Alabama common law and let them sue someone else. [read post]
4 Jan 2014, 9:47 am by Schachtman
” “Health Hazard Progress Notes: Compensation Advance Made in New York State,” 16(5) Asbestos Worker 13 (May 1966). [read post]
7 Jul 2013, 11:39 am by Schachtman
  By 1975, EPA and OSHA had promulgated regulations that curtailed the use of asbestos, of all types, in the United States. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 2:30 pm by Bexis
Johns–Manville Corp., 539 A.2d 871 (1988), where the defendants were asbestos manufacturers headquartered in Pennsylvania and the plaintiff was a New Jersey resident injured, mostly, in New Jersey (but also a little in Pennsylvania). [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 3:12 pm
Simply stated, Travelers Insurance Company, who provided general liability coverage and other insurance between 1947 and 1976 to Johns Manville Corp, is no longer required to pay nearly $500 million towards asbestos settlements; specifically, the claims that center on the asbestos products manufactured by now-bankrupt Johns Manville Corp., one of the largest manufacturers of asbestos products in U.S. history. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 1:24 pm by Schachtman
Action No. 720,071 (February 19, 1971) Karjala v Johns-Manville Products Corp.,  D. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 12:11 pm
" Manville Sales Corp. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2009, 1:57 pm
See Manville Sales Corp. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 6:31 pm
Cir. 1995); see also State Indus., Inc. v. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 1:29 am
Cir. 2006) (quoting Manville Sales Corp. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 1:22 am
[6/9/09 PM Update:  The United States Supreme Court just cleared the Chrysler sale! [read post]