Search for: "Marcia Weiss"
Results 21 - 33
of 33
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Oct 2013, 7:00 am
Weiss and Netty C. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 11:16 am
Apple was advised on the auction by lawyers at Weil, Gotshal & Manges, including partners Marcia Goldstein, Kyle Krpata, and Ronit Berkovich, according to a person connected to one of the other firms involved in the auction. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 11:16 am
Apple was advised on the auction by lawyers at Weil, Gotshal & Manges, including partners Marcia Goldstein, Kyle Krpata, and Ronit Berkovich, according to a person connected to one of the other firms involved in the auction. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 6:50 am
Weiss, President, American Society of International Law; and Professor, Georgetown University Law Center Diane P. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 4:16 am
Marcia Coyle examined the significance of the case for The National Law Journal, observing both that “[l]itigation will increase . . . because companies can no longer claim a safe harbor from those suits simply because the U.S. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 4:12 am
” Additional coverage of Class comes from Debra Cassens Weiss at the ABA Journal. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 11:10 am
Weiss, Bernard G. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 7:40 am
Weiss, Dr. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 2:25 pm
The Fear of Foreign Husbands; The Gendered Aspects of US Marital Immigration Law Panelist: Marcia Zug, University of South Carolina School of Law Commentator: Kerry Abrams Thursday, June 2, 4:45 to 6:30 pm [Panel 1230] Wither Redistribution? [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 7:13 am
The Bradford Hill Predicate: Ruling Out Random and Systematic Error In two recent posts, I spent some time discussing a recent law review, which had some important things to say about specific causation.[1] One of several points from which I dissented was the article’s argument that Sir Austin Bradford Hill had not made explicit that ruling out random and systematic error was required before assessing his nine “viewpoints” on whether an association was causal. [read post]
24 Nov 2012, 12:38 pm
For instance, Taubes quoted Marcia Angell, a former editor of the New England Journal of Medicine, as articulating a general rule: “As a general rule of thumb, we are looking for a relative risk of 3 or more [before accepting a paper for publication], particularly if it is biologically implausible or if it’s a brand new finding. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 7:32 pm
Confounding in the Lower Courts To some extent, lower courts, especially in the federal court system, got the message: Rule 702 required them to think about the evidence, and to consider threats to validity. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 1:35 pm
Kannon Shanmugam Chair of Supreme Court and appellate practice group, Paul Weiss It’s hard to imagine being in the Supreme Court without seeing Art and his sketch pad. [read post]
