Search for: "Mark A Heckler"
Results 21 - 40
of 76
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jan 2021, 11:21 am
To bring back the Fairness Doctrine and then apply it to all media would mark a serious incursion on First Amendment rights. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 8:30 am
This sort of heckler's veto is inconsistent with Georgia law, which generally does not hold businesses liable for behavior of third parties that it cannot control, and which generally requires a showing that a nuisance was proximately caused by defendants rather than by the supervening acts of third parties. [read post]
1 Nov 2020, 7:21 am
In other words, Janus is determined to have not addressed the subject of a public sector employee such as Clifford Heckler who, unlike Mark Janus, voluntarily chose to become a union member and voluntarily authorized his public sector employer to deduct union membership dues from his employee paycheck. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 10:28 am
As Kaye says, in a comment seemingly aimed at those concerned that international human rights law will be insufficiently protective of free speech, “[T]here is no ‘heckler’s veto’ in international human rights law. [read post]
15 May 2019, 2:09 pm
They have implications for arguments about third-party harms, "government nonendorsement," student speech, and heckler's veto doctrine. [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 6:08 am
Heckler—they had organizational standing. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 5:03 am
This represents a marked departure from the relaxed standing requirements used in prior freedom of speech cases, especially those involving speech codes. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 9:50 am
In a response to Howard's post below about the "Blackman incident," Mark Tushnet has a valuable comment, citing to recent work by Jeremy Waldron, arguing for a particular interpretation of heckler's veto doctrine. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 10:00 am
Addressing Kaspersky’s suggestion that DHS’s process was “illusory” since it “prejudiced” federal agencies against Kaspersky, the government says the agencies that removed Kaspersky software before the 90-day mark did so “of their own initiative” and were not legally compelled to do so by DHS. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 6:27 am
| Bad faith confirmed for ALEXANDER trade mark application? [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 4:41 am
When 5% of all the live contested trade marks before the EUIPO go back to the same person, the outcome cannot really come as a surprise as reported in Bad faith confirmed for ALEXANDER trade mark application? [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 2:57 am
Katfriend Guido Noto La Diega (Northumbria University) provides an overview of the issues surrounding olfactory marks in the EU and UK: Scents and trade marks - The EU reform of olfactory marks and advances in odour recognition techniques.Trade mark for a fabric pattern? [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 8:28 am
Prior to the 20th century, Election Day characteristically took on a circus atmosphere, sometimes marked by fistfights and vocal arguments. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 4:34 am
| Brussels court in FN Herstal v Heckler & Koch wrestles with combination invention v mere aggregation of features | Brexit: requests to Govt from IP professional bodies | Street heart: urban murals as common goods | Have your say on the UK implementation of the EUPortability Regulation: public consultation now open! [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 2:10 pm
Brussels court in FN Herstal v Heckler & Koch wrestles with combination invention v mere aggregation of features. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm
Heckler, 752 .2d 1099 (5th Cir. 1985), which provides: “An impairment can be considered as not severe only if it is a slight abnormality (having) such minimal effect on the individual that it would not be expected to interfere with the individual’s ability to work, irrespective of age, education, or work experience. [read post]
18 Oct 2017, 9:01 pm
It will soon have been three weeks since the Las Vegas shooting massacre, but already the news cycle has moved on. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 9:01 pm
In a recent posting, our friend and respected colleague Mark Tushnet of the Harvard Law School wrote: There’s another case that I think is easy one way, although I know lots of people who think it’s easy in just the opposite way: when a raucous crowd shouts down the speaker. [read post]
24 Sep 2017, 3:02 pm
Mark Tushnet, writing on Vox and Balkinization, argues that the counter-speakers/hecklers/audience members who attempt to shout down other speakers engage in constitutionally protected activities and the First Amendment is violated by many of a state university's efforts to stop hecklers. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 3:00 pm
That rally reflected this nation’s history of slavery, racial violence and terrorism, which has left an indelible mark on our democracy to this day. [read post]
